RE: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-31 Thread Nick Lothian
> > > > IIRC, FeedParser is languishing for need of a community. > > > > It really ought to just be dead. Kevin (original coder) decided to > > fork it externally so he wouldn't be tied up by our focus on not > > having single coder codebases (if I understand things correctly). > > There wasn't

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-31 Thread Torsten Curdt
> IIRC, FeedParser is languishing for need of a community. It really ought to just be dead. Kevin (original coder) decided to fork it externally so he wouldn't be tied up by our focus on not having single coder codebases (if I understand things correctly). There wasn't any interest in FeedParser

RE: Incubator releases

2006-05-31 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> When making releases from the Incubator, where is the recommended > place to put the distributions? Since it had been cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/${project}, I suppose that it would be people.apache.org/dist/incubator/${project}. > I'm wondering if the lack of an incubator directory on the mi

Incubator releases

2006-05-31 Thread Henri Yandell
When making releases from the Incubator, where is the recommended place to put the distributions? Putting it in people.apache.org/~foo/ is pretty weak, but I'm wondering if the lack of an incubator directory on the mirrors means that going to the mirrors is not permitted? Hen --

[STATUS] (incubator) Wed May 31 23:56:24 2006

2006-05-31 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $] Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/ Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ [note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki

Re: ARI, Atom Reference Implementation [Proposal]

2006-05-31 Thread Henri Yandell
On 5/25/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Nick Lothian wrote: > There's also Jakarta FeedParser, which has an Atom parser. > Also the ROME project (http://rome.dev.java.net/) has been debating > requesting incubation at Apache for quite a long time. We've got an > Atom parser, too.

Re: [VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

2006-05-31 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 5/31/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This proposal seems to have generated a lot of geniune interest, so now I'm calling for a vote for the Incubator to formally accept it. A few editorial comments: at this point, I have little doubt that this codebase will attract a diverse and susta

[VOTE] Incubator to sponsor and accept Abdera for incubation

2006-05-31 Thread Sam Ruby
This proposal seems to have generated a lot of geniune interest, so now I'm calling for a vote for the Incubator to formally accept it. A few editorial comments: at this point, I have little doubt that this codebase will attract a diverse and sustainable community. My concern is now the reverse:

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve Synapse M2 release

2006-05-31 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 5/30/06, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The release files are here: http://people.apache.org/~pzf/synapse/M2/Synapse-Incubating-M2-bin.zip ( 3.8Mb) http://people.apache.org/~pzf/synapse/M2/Synapse-Incubating-M2-src.zip(260Kb) blockers: * the binary distribution seems to be l

RE: [RESULT] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1

2006-05-31 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Jeremy Boynes wrote: > Passed with +1's from dims, jim, pzf, stoddard, jstrachan and no -1's. Please check with Cliff that your understanding regarding Rhino distribution as you explained it to Bill's objection is correct. Not to hold up the release, since you've documented the license and are i

[RESULT] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1

2006-05-31 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On 5/25/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403 We would like to request approval from the In

Re: [VOTE] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1

2006-05-31 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 (binding) On 5/31/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 (binding) On 5/26/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues > Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.c

Re: [VOTE] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1

2006-05-31 Thread James Strachan
+1 (binding) On 5/26/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403 We would like to request approv

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve ActiveMQ 4.0 Release

2006-05-31 Thread James Strachan
On 5/27/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 13:11 +0100, James Strachan wrote: > In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the > ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0 release binary. > > We would now like to request the perm