Jeremy Boynes wrote:
We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
this new
On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
README.txt and userGuide.html (at least) should be updated to
reflect Apache ActiveMQ, not just 'ActiveMQ'
Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release?
I've found some information on the STATUS file but I think I'm missing
something b
On 5/27/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release?
I had the same question relating to the Tuscany release. In general I
don't think it should as STATUS reflects the state of the project
rather than the code being distributed and technical
README.txt and userGuide.html (at least) should be updated to
reflect Apache ActiveMQ, not just 'ActiveMQ'
Is STATUS appropriate to be bundled in the release?
Will vote +1 after the above are addressed.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
James Strachan wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0 release binary.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
perform the release.
+1
Bill
