Here's my +1 (binding)
-- dims
On 5/26/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0 release binary.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
perfo
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 13:11 +0100, James Strachan wrote:
> In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
> ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0 release binary.
>
> We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
> perform the release.
>
> R
+1 (binding)
Paul
On 5/26/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks OK to me. +1
On May 25, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
> Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
> http://article.gmane.o
Looks OK to me. +1
On May 25, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
http://article.gmane.org/
gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
We would like to request
In accordance with the incubator release procedure (see below) the
ActiveMQ community has voted on and approved the 4.0 release binary.
We would now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to
perform the release.
Release notes:
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/activemq-40-release
