APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
-1
Bill Stoddard is correct in his understanding of
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases. The
fact that other people have voted +1 without verifying that the release
adheres to Incubator policy is a bit disturbing, but that's why we have
multiple sets of eyes on
The incubation disclaimer is in the README.txt file at the root of the
distributions.
The "incubator" is prepended to the maven groupId which leads to a
incubator-servicemix directory name where
all attributes are available. This have already been the case for
several incubating projects so I a
On 4/19/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is obviously not an open source license (eg strange limitations on
> redistribution, no license to create derivative works, bla bla). We
> obviously want to share this code with others under the terms of an open
> source license. So you sho
IANAL. I played one on stage once, but it wasn't much of a success.
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 11:57:47AM -0700, Don Brown wrote:
> I'd like to get the WebWork 2 podling out of incubation and into Struts, but
> I have some questions to help determine if the requirements have been met.
>
> 1. Does a
I'd like to get the WebWork 2 podling out of incubation and into Struts, but
I have some questions to help determine if the requirements have been met.
1. Does all Java code have to use the ASF copyright header? We have some
files that have a "NanoContainer Organization" copyright, with an
ASF-d
+1
On Apr 18, 2006, at 10:59 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 (binding) from me.
thanks,
dims
On 4/18/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do we do if the Logging PMC approved this release (it has) but
the Incubator PMC only has one +1 vote and no other votes (as is
currently the c
Hi Guillaume,
If my interpretation of the incubator release policy is correct, we need to place an 'incubating disclaimer'
in the README.txt and name the distributed files incubating-servicemix-3.0-M1*
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
* the release archiv
The ServiceMix project voted on and has approved a proposal to release
ServiceMix 3.0-M1.
Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and we would
now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
distribution on the ServiceMix web site.
The vote threads ca
On Monday 17 April 2006 06:38, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Yes. Sun is quite serious about proposing JINI to go through Incubation.
FWIW, This has been an on-going process for well over a year, when the switch
to Apache license v2 was performed.
I think we (Apache) can expect the discussion in the
+1
On 4/19/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> -- dims
>
> On 4/18/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The ServiceMix project voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> > ServiceMix 3.0-M1.
> > Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
11 matches
Mail list logo
