I have prepared a Wiki page to help prepare this month's board report.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2006
Please edit your section this week. The board calendar is a bit odd this
month, but I have dental surgery on Monday, and don't know how "useful" I
will be next week.
Every project
Ok - I think I now hold the world record for a "1 week vote"
There were 19 votes in favor (+1) and no votes of any other kind.
Let the mayhem begin.
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki
Congrats on that 1.0, btw...
geir
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Umm, releases are packages that are supplied to the public.
I don't vote on release candidates that are not in final bit form.
Unless the exact names and bits are used that are expected
to be placed on dist once it is approved, my vote w
Umm, releases are packages that are supplied to the public.
I don't vote on release candidates that are not in final bit form.
Unless the exact names and bits are used that are expected
to be placed on dist once it is approved, my vote will not
be given. If I were responsible for the project, then
On 4/10/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Strachan wrote:
>
> > Release tarball:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0-RC2/distributions/
>
> > Releases section of the Incubation Policy:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#
James Strachan wrote:
> so far after 4 days we've just had one vote from the Incubator PMC
> So how about we broaden membership of the Incubator PMC to include
> anyone interested from another PMC (rather than just Apache Members
> only)? [The] effect would be [allowing] folks who are actually
>
James Strachan wrote:
> Release tarball:
>
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0-RC2/distributions/
> Releases section of the Incubation Policy:
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
As per the latter:
* the release archive MUST contain the
On 4/10/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, I took a few days off... It's hard enough to deal with the "no
> email shakes"...
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Works fine, and my little nit has been fixed - the URL in the startup
> log blather points to the project website.
Thanks Geir - hop
Hey, I took a few days off... It's hard enough to deal with the "no
email shakes"...
+1 from me.
Works fine, and my little nit has been fixed - the URL in the startup
log blather points to the project website.
geir
James Strachan wrote:
Just a reminder to the Incubator-PMC - could you plea
Sounds good. Many thanks!
Regards,
Alan
Jim Jagielski wrote, On 4/10/2006 7:50 AM:
It was sent via postal mail. I can make another copy
and send it out. Most likely later on this week.
On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:17 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Thanks Jim. It seems that LogicBlaze may have misplac
It was sent via postal mail. I can make another copy
and send it out. Most likely later on this week.
On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:17 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Thanks Jim. It seems that LogicBlaze may have misplaced this
copy. Would it be possible for it to be sent again? How, exactly
will this
Still thinking about this...
...just wanted to note that the incubator PMC is responsive for some stuff
but not for other stuff. For example
* when you raise a generic issue like this you get an answer
or some kind of feedback within a few hours or at most a few days.
* simpler questions of
On 4/10/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/10/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/10/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > incubator? Then at least if the Incubator PMC are too busy to get
> > > involved on a particular project, folks from t
On 4/10/06, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/10/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > incubator? Then at least if the Incubator PMC are too busy to get
> > involved on a particular project, folks from the sponsoring PMC can on
> > their behalf.
>
> I would think that
On 4/10/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> incubator? Then at least if the Incubator PMC are too busy to get
> involved on a particular project, folks from the sponsoring PMC can on
> their behalf.
I would think that to be contrary to the incubators intentions. In
effect, it would le
On 4/10/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:44:45AM +0100, James Strachan wrote:
> > Just a reminder to the Incubator-PMC - could you please vote to
> > approve this release. We had 5 votes from the Geronimo PMC within 24
> > hours of calling the vote and so far a
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 10:44:45AM +0100, James Strachan wrote:
> Just a reminder to the Incubator-PMC - could you please vote to
> approve this release. We had 5 votes from the Geronimo PMC within 24
> hours of calling the vote and so far after 4 days we've just had one
> vote from the Incubator P
Just a reminder to the Incubator-PMC - could you please vote to
approve this release. We had 5 votes from the Geronimo PMC within 24
hours of calling the vote and so far after 4 days we've just had one
vote from the Incubator PMC (excluding myself who's in all camps).
Given the inactivity of the I
I would be +1, but first I want to know if
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/log4net.html is up-to-date.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
19 matches
Mail list logo
