Leo,
Many of the folks in the ActiveMQ project already have been through
the incubation process once before when we put Geronimo though. It's
not like this is our first rodeo. So in our eyes we really do think
we are very close to having satisfied the incubation requirements. I
think Alan was o
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The conversation on OpenJPA has been quiet for about a week so I was
wondering if there are outstanding issues that need to be resolved or
this could be moved to a vote to accept the project and what the next
steps are. I'm kind of excited to get it going.
Geir, oh might
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Answering my own question, there are 27 people on the proposal. Here's
the list of folks who actually made any commits (grand total of 15)
Those are interesting -- though potentially meaningl
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, James Strachan wrote:
BTW we are currently calling all the artifacts incubator-activemq-*,
the jars are all called incubator-activemq*.jar, we include
disclaimers in the distro highlighting the incubator status and also
include these inside the manife
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Answering my own question, there are 27 people on the proposal. Here's
> the list of folks who actually made any commits (grand total of 15)
Those are interesting -- though potentially meaningless -- data.
Let's try applying
my 2 cents.
(i) don't use the incubator code, but fork it elsewhere (say to
codehaus) and make releases there if Geronimo needs bug fixes
-1
(ii) Geronimo use incubator release candidate releases
+1
(iii) ActiveMQ performs actual releases that Geronimo can depend on
and use but put sufficient
On 3/16/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/06, Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 - although I wonder if it would be worth letting new projects report
> > each month for the first 3 months?
>
> ++1. This follows the Board's treatment of new TLPs so that we can
>
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, James Strachan wrote:
BTW we are currently calling all the artifacts incubator-activemq-*,
the jars are all called incubator-activemq*.jar, we include
disclaimers in the distro highlighting the incubator status and also
include these inside the manifests of the jars. So it
