Re: [VOTE] approve a milestone release of ActiveMQ?

What's the current vote at? IIUC, if Noel remove's his -1 vote, the release is good to go. Regards, Alan On 2/9/2006 2:02 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: I don't see any further issues with the ActiveMQ M4 release. I think we should we restart the release vote. Regards, Hiram On Feb 8, 2006,

Re: [web site] link to anchor within same page not working

David Crossley wrote: > Jean T. Anderson wrote: >> ... >>http://incubator.apache.org/"; /> >> >>I removed that setting and links to anchors in the same page now work -- >>at least locally. But it regenerates every page on the site, so I >>hesitate to commit. >> >>What am I likely to break on the in

Re: [web site] link to anchor within same page not working

Jean T. Anderson wrote: > I added a table of contents to > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html, but the > links to anchors within the same page don't work. Same problem occurs > in another page: the last sentence of > http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html also

[web site] link to anchor within same page not working

I added a table of contents to http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html, but the links to anchors within the same page don't work. Same problem occurs in another page: the last sentence of http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html also has a link to an anchor in the sa

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Jean T. Anderson wrote: > Leo Simons wrote: > > > >+1 sounds good. Perhaps its good to incorporate by reference the HTTPD > >release guidelines or similar. > > good suggestion. > > thanks, Also Robert has been doing a heap of work pulling together all of the information about releases. See http

Re: [VOTE] approve a milestone release of ActiveMQ?

I don't see any further issues with the ActiveMQ M4 release. I think we should we restart the release vote. Regards, Hiram On Feb 8, 2006, at 2:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Noel, I think that these issues have now been addressed. I have gathered up the information from subsequent repli

Status page committed

Hi, The xmlbeanscxx status page has been committed. I'm told that http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html needs to be updated with a link to our status page. Can someone please do this or let me know who to ask to get this done? T

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Good info, thanks! The relationship (committers == PPMC) seems reasonable to me, especially in light of the current discussion of releases. Martin Martin Sebor wrote: I thought every committer's vote counted as bi

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Roy T. Fielding wrote: > ... > There is no need to "notify the PPMC". > > PMC == Project Management Committee == the people who make decisions > for a project == the people with binding votes in public decisions > == the people on the dev list we listen to when they vote. > > Anyone not on the d

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Martin Sebor wrote: > Jean T. Anderson wrote: > [...] > >> it should be public vote, so on the public -dev list. Here's a >> suggested refinement: >> >> "Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the >> Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list and notif

Re: [doc] podling software releases

On Feb 9, 2006, at 10:27 AM, Jean T. Anderson wrote: dev list or ppmc list? Only PMC members' votes are binding for full TLPs; I suggest having the vote on the dev list as mentioned but only the PPMC members' votes being binding. it should be public vote, so on the public -dev list. Here's a

Re: CORBA Incubation setup procedures

On 2/8/2006 7:27 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: ALL incubator requests for infrastructure MUST be reflected in an appropriate status file under http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html before they are requested. There are no exceptions. Roy I shall do this. Regards, Alan -

Re: [doc] podling software releases

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Sebor wrote: > > I thought every committer's vote counted as binding. Grey-area time here.. In projects where committers == PMC, that's the case. The confusion probably has its origins in the HTTP server project back before there *was* an AS

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Jean T. Anderson wrote: [...] it should be public vote, so on the public -dev list. Here's a suggested refinement: "Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling's public -dev list and notify the Podling's PPMC list that the vote

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Leo Simons wrote: Well, that's I think the official rules of most projects. In practice what I've seen happen usually is that when someone throws a -1 its for a serious reason and the vote is simply aborted, the problem is fixed, and a new release is made. Just t

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [...] "Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling -dev list. dev list or ppmc list? Only PMC members' votes are binding for full TLPs; I suggest

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Martin Sebor wrote: > >>>Jean T. Anderson wrote: >>> >>> This is a follow up on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-14, which I opened to track this doc topic. >>> >>>[...] >>> >>> (2) Process details I'd like to modify this se

Re: [doc] podling software releases

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Sebor wrote: > Jean T. Anderson wrote: > >>This is a follow up on >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-14, which I opened to >>track this doc topic. > > [...] > >>(2) Process details >> >>I'd like to modify this sentence: >> >>

Re: [doc] podling software releases

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Leo Simons wrote: > > Well, that's I think the official rules of most projects. In practice > what I've seen happen usually is that when someone throws a -1 its for > a serious reason and the vote is simply aborted, the problem is fixed, > and a new r

Re: CORBA Incubation setup procedures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> >>Anyone on general@incubator.apache.org have any comments >>to make on the proposal? Even just 'yeah, looks good >>to me' ? > > CRAP. CRAP. CRAP. CRAP. > > I could have sworn that I sent this to general@incubator.apache.o

Re: OFBiz - next steps

On Feb 8, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: On Feb 8, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: In that case, each person who ever committed a line of code needs to submit a iCLA which allows their patches (and therefore, once everyone has one on file, the complete codebase) to be relice

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Jean T. Anderson wrote: Leo Simons wrote: On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 08:21:27AM -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote: In http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200601.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Roy wrote: Minimum three binding (official PMC) +1 votes and a majority of all votes bei

Re: [VOTE-RESULT] Yoko - A CORBA Server Sub-Project Proposal - PASSED

On Feb 8, 2006, at 6:23 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: At graduation, the community will decide its final resting place? Interesting choice of words =) -Brian - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Leo Simons wrote: On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 08:21:27AM -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote: In http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200601.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Roy wrote: Minimum three binding (official PMC) +1 votes and a majority of all votes being positive. Releases do

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Martin Sebor wrote: Jean T. Anderson wrote: ... "Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling SHALL hold a vote on the Podling -dev list. If the majority of all votes is positive, then send a summary of that vote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and formally request the

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Jean T. Anderson wrote: This is a follow up on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-14, which I opened to track this doc topic. [...] (2) Process details I'd like to modify this sentence: "Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling SHALL formal

Re: [doc] podling software releases

On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 08:21:27AM -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote: > In > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200601.mbox/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] > Roy wrote: > > >Minimum three binding (official PMC) +1 votes and a majority of all > >votes being positive. Releases do not nee

Re: [doc] podling software releases

Leo Simons wrote: On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:00:09PM -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote: ... (2) Process details I'd like to modify this sentence: "Therefore, should a Podling decide it wishes to perform a release, the Podling SHALL formally request the Incubator PMC approve such a release." A

Re: [doc] podling software releases

On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:00:09PM -0800, Jean T. Anderson wrote: > (1) What's the "Charter" referred to in this section? > > There are two "Reference to Charter" sentences: > > "Such approval SHALL be given only after the Incubator PMC has followed > the process detailed in (Reference to Charte

Re: CORBA Incubation setup procedures

(infra@ dropped from CC on purpose) On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:41:26PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > I think I need: > > > > * SVN > > o http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko > > * Jira > > * Mailing lists > > o [EMAIL P