APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2006-02-05 04:40:19 -0500 (Sun, 05 Feb 2006) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
The Incubator PMC has discussed and voted to adopt the following:
Any ASF Member may ask to participate on the Incubator PMC. The Incubator
PMC Chair shall submit the request to the Board (cc to the PMC) to be
acknowledged. At any time between the Member's request and prior to the
expiration of
This is a follow up on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-14, which I opened to
track this doc topic.
I'd like to clarify the "Releases" section in
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html (I'll also
add a table of contents to the top of that page to make it
same thing in Harmony.
And I'm betting J2SE is bigger than CORBA :)
geir
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Ken,
FYI, some of us are handling (definitely in synapse!) this is by
having the existing Apache folks to pick up the heavy load at the
beginning and new people submit patches.
As and when the r
ALL incubator requests for infrastructure MUST be reflected in an
appropriate status file under
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html
before they are requested. There are no exceptions.
Roy
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi Ken,
I reviewed the proposal and yeah, it looks good to me. (non-binding)
CORBA is a huge piece of work and I'm not surprised that it takes 22.
I'd be surprised if the number of initial committers were less than
13. (random number generator 6..18)
Craig
On Feb 8, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Rode
Ken,
FYI, some of us are handling (definitely in synapse!) this is by
having the existing Apache folks to pick up the heavy load at the
beginning and new people submit patches.
As and when the rate picks up and becomes difficult (read earn Karma)
then we vote and add them in, otherwise we just pi
Ken wrote:
> Before we start setting things up, I'd really like to
> call for some opinions about the proposal from *outside*
> the sponsoring TLP.
Please see the threads around "Changes to Incubator Process(es)" from
January. There has been some call for the Incubator PMC to have more
control o
On 2/8/2006 5:41 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I think I need:
* SVN
o http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko
* Jira
* Mailing lists
o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2/8/2006 5:50 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Alan,
Please note that this is not a Geronimo sub-project. Incubator projects are
just that: Incubator projects whose final destination will be determined at
graduation.
Amongst other issues, we want to be inviting and inclusive of whomever wants
On 2/8/2006 5:16 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
The only person who's stepped up and volunteered is Geir. Is there
anyone else? Are two mentors enough?
I'm there also.
Yep. Thanks Ken!
Regards,
Alan
Alan,
Please note that this is not a Geronimo sub-project. Incubator projects are
just that: Incubator projects whose final destination will be determined at
graduation.
Amongst other issues, we want to be inviting and inclusive of whomever wants to
participate, including other ASF projects.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> I think I need:
>
> * SVN
> o http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko
> * Jira
> * Mailing lists
> o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Han
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> The only person who's stepped up and volunteered is Geir. Is there
> anyone else? Are two mentors enough?
I'm there also.
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opin
I think I need:
* SVN
o http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/yoko
* Jira
* Mailing lists
o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Alan
Thanks to everyone helping clear up things. What Roy says here would
indicate that we wouldn't strictly need the grant for out FOP
contribution because the code is already published under the ALv2 and
all three people involved have ICLAs on file with the ASF. :-) But I'm
sure we can get them to do
On Feb 8, 2006, at 2:12 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Actually, it is only needed from everyone who might own copyright
to some part of the work. So, it is those people who have contributed
functionality greater than a simple bug fix.
OTOH, the mentors should be aware that, because this work is
On Feb 8, 2006, at 10:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The reason is that the Software Grant is a legal vehicles that
says "I/We own this software and we are granting it to
the ASF". So unless there is a legal entity that owns
the code, they cannot grant it to the ASF to allow us to
relicense it.
y
Okay, I think this thread is clearing up the issues pretty well. The
iCLA is the most important part in this case, and will be much easier
to get through with everyone than a license grant.
Technically "The Open For Business Project" is a legal entity, but it
doesn't really own any of the
On Feb 8, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 08.02.2006 09:48:39 Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/7/06, David E. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any guidelines about the size of a code contribution that
would necessitate a license grant document?
You would just need a CLA
On 2/8/06, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That seems contradictory to what the IP clearance page says. Now I'm
> totally confused because that would mean we don't need that complex
> process of getting the software grant together for that contribution
> we're planning to integrate in
On 2/8/06, David E. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Under the MIT license we have been using there is no assignment or
> granting of copyright. All of the code is licensed under the MIT
> license, and the copyright everywhere is listed under "The Open For
> Business Project". I don't know if th
Hi all,
do we really need to create an ip-clearance page for the OFBiz project?
After reading the informations here
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html
I think that we don't need such a page for OFBiz since it is a new project.
Am I wrong?
Jacopo
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On
On 2/5/2006 2:32 PM, David N. Welton wrote:
Leo Simons wrote:
*) IP clearance checklist - I need to make a copy of that in SVN here,
/incubator/site-author/ip-clearance. I'll try and get that done over
the weekend.
Ok, I added /incubator/site-author/ip-clearance/ofbiz.xml - althou
On 08.02.2006 09:48:39 Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 2/7/06, David E. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are there any guidelines about the size of a code contribution that
> > would necessitate a license grant document?
>
> You would just need a CLA not a software grant form for each contribut
On 2/7/06, David E. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any guidelines about the size of a code contribution that
> would necessitate a license grant document?
You would just need a CLA not a software grant form for each contributor.
SpamAssassin required every person who ever submitted
26 matches
Mail list logo
