APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-11-24 00:30:24 -0500 (Thu, 24 Nov 2005) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
- Original Message -
From: "David Crossley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: Incubator site status wrt a move to Anakia?
| David Crossley wrote:
| > It is time to make a plan for the move to Anakia.
| > We cannot afford for it to drag on an
David Crossley wrote:
> ---
> 2) Refine the stylesheet
>
> site/xdocs2/stylesheets/site.vsl
>
> Seen only one problem so far. It needs to handle
> more than two levels of subsection.
>
> This can be fixed later.
Youch, the stylesheet is producing hard-coded
html style attributes suc
David Crossley wrote:
> It is time to make a plan for the move to Anakia.
> We cannot afford for it to drag on any longer.
>
> ---
> 1) Review the generated source documents in site/xdocs2
>
> Did the transformation perform okay?
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/t
+1
Tom Jordahl
Web Service PMC
From: Lawrence Mandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 3:25 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: woden-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Request approval to declare Woden
I absolutely agree that if a project is housed at projectX.apache.org,
people will automatically associate projectX as an apache project, with
the full rights, privileges, and standing of all other apache projects,
from a marketing/branding perspective.
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, David N. Welton
Following the release process for projects in incubation, I'd like to
request approval for Woden to declare milestone 3. A vote was held on the
woden-dev list where M3 received 5 +1 votes and no negative votes. The
votes collected are as follows:
John Kaputin +1
Lawrence Mandel +1
Dims +1
Jerem
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raphaël Luta wrote:
> As far I can tell, what needs to happen to fully OSS AjaxTk
> is something like this:
> - cleanup the code/doc/install
I would expect that at worst those would be early doings during Incubation.
> - rework a clear internal separation between AjaxTk and ZCS
> - adjust inter
We should also review
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200508.mbox/%3c43
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and see if we can involve those folks, too.
My recollection of the discussion from ApacheCon EU was that there was quite
an enthusiastic discussion over the idea of a pluggable, ex
After some good thought about what to do with the system I am currently writing, I have come to the
conclusion that there is a big overlap between ofbiz and it is worth it to invest the time to start
using ofbiz for my solution and also this way prevent too much code duplication.
In short : I w
Hi,
First, +1 for the proposal vote.
> these requirements and policies. In any case, both David and I have
> expressed a willingness to mentor and I believe Yoav may be as well,
> though I don't recall him specifically saying so.
I would prefer to remain a champion rather than a mentor at this t
On 1/25/06, David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
> >> * David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> * Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> * J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > Where are the mentors? Are the champions also going to mentor
> > the project?
J Aaron Farr wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
>
> = OFBiz Proposal =
+1
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J Aaron Farr wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
>
> = OFBiz Proposal =
>
> This proposal outlines the creation of a new, top-level Open for
> Business (OFBiz) project within the Apache Software Foundation.
+1 (non-binding)
from me as well, just for the record.
--
David N.
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>> * David N. Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> * Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> * J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> Where are the mentors? Are the champions also going to mentor
> the project?
According to the docs I read, the incubator PMC is supposed to assig
On Jan 24, 2006, at 7:44 PM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
...
== Committers ==
* David E. Jones
* Andy Zeneski
* Si Chen
* Al Byers
* Jacopo Cappellato
* Hans Bakker
== Proposed Apache Sponsor ==
Incubator PMC
== Champions ==
* David N. Welton <[E
+1 from me
Paul
On 1/25/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
>
> > Sanjiva,
> >
> > Sorry about violating Apache netiquette. This was not intentional.
> > I had
> > previously been asked to send this vote to the incubator and ws pm
On Jan 24, 2006, at 8:44 PM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
= OFBiz Proposal =
+1 (non-binding)
I'm obviously a little biased on this because of my involvement in
OFBiz and not sure if my vote is even appropriate, but I wanted to
make sure everyone kn
On Jan 25, 2006, at 12:24 AM, Raphaël Luta wrote: As far I can tell, what needs to happen to fully OSS AjaxTk is something like this: - cleanup the code/doc/install so that Tk can be consumed by a public communityIt seems to me that something that works in some cases but isn't fully developed as
Is this list up to date?
http://incubator.apache.org/whoweare.html#PMC+%28Project+Management+Commitee%29
I assume Justin and Bill Rowe are both members but I don't their
names there.
Thanks
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM
+1 from me.
On 1/25/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/25/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The stdcxx community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> > stdcxx 4.1.3. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
> > Policy and with the endorseme
Dear incubator pmc members,
Can you please cast your VOTE for a Woden milestone release? See below
for my +1.
Sanjiva, Paul,
We need 3 +1's. So i'd appreciate if you could respond quickly.
Quoting Roy "Minimum three binding (official PMC) +1 votes and a
majority of all votes being positive. Relea
On 1/25/06, Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The stdcxx community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
> stdcxx 4.1.3. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
> Policy and with the endorsement of two of our mentors we would now
> like to request the permission of the
On 1/25/06, Mads Toftum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1 (non-binding) - I think this proposal is too different
> from our other projects to be a good fit for the ASF.
My belief is that the foundation goes in the direction that our
members want. We've got three members who are willing to step up.
On 1/24/06, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
>
> = OFBiz Proposal =
+1. -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
On 1/23/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> = Kabuki, an AJAX Toolkit Proposal =
+1. -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 (non binding)
Mvgr,
Martin
Sam Ruby wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KabukiProposal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 (non binding)
Mvgr,
Martin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 11:44, J Aaron Farr wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
= OFBiz Proposal =
+1 (non-binding)
I look forward to working on this project as part of the ASF (or otherwise)
Ross
---
The stdcxx community voted on and has approved a proposal to release
stdcxx 4.1.3. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation
Policy and with the endorsement of two of our mentors we would now
like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
tarball on the stdcxx Download
-1 (non-binding) - I think this proposal is too different
from our other projects to be a good fit for the ASF.
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 11:44, J Aaron Farr wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
>
> = OFBiz Proposal =
+1 (non-binding).
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMA
+1
Personally I'm quite impressed that we've had 3
independent-of-each-other committers talking to us on the previous
thread. Seems like a good indication of community from the very
beginning.
Hen
On 1/24/06, J Aaron Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposa
>As I've said it before, TMC doesn't do the trick for me - plain MC
>would do better to remove the Tomcat reference and eventually avoid
>Apache The ...
>Of the two alternatives, I think the second is the better choice.
Sounds like the TMC name is out, "Ohana" is currently the front runner,
addit
Sam Ruby wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KabukiProposal
>
> Contents of proposal reproduced below:
>
-0,9
--
Raphaël Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache Portals - Enterprise Portal in Java
http://portals.apache.org/
-
Andrew Clark wrote:
> Raphaël Luta wrote:
>
>
>>- no source control access
>
>
> We have read-only CVS access[1] already for the entire
> project. The details should definitely be more visible,
> though. I'll talk to someone about getting it more
> prominent on the main site.
>
I missed the li
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> David N. Welton wrote:
No I didn't - the comment below was Raphael Luta's - probably evident
because of the double layer of quoting, but still...
>>>I would agree with this if there was no immediate percieved benefit
>>>when you are in Incubator, unfortunately it seems pr
38 matches
Mail list logo
