It is time to make a plan for the move to Anakia.
We cannot afford for it to drag on any longer.
---
1) Review the generated source documents in site/xdocs2
Did the transformation perform okay?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site/README.txt
---
2)
Since I don't really know my way around the Eclipse community very
well, I thought I might ask the question here.
I was really interested in the Eclipse portion of the original Kabuki
proposal but that's now been kicked over to the Eclipse foundation.
So, does anyone know where I can join in on t
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
= OFBiz Proposal =
This proposal outlines the creation of a new, top-level Open for
Business (OFBiz) project within the Apache Software Foundation.
== Rationale ==
The Open For Business Project is an open source enterprise automation
software proje
David N. Welton wrote:
> > I would agree with this if there was no immediate percieved benefit
> > when you are in Incubator, unfortunately it seems projects under
> > incubation are still perceived by the larger community as endorsed by
> > Apache.
Actually, we've had quite a few comments from t
On Jan 24, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
Sanjiva,
Sorry about violating Apache netiquette. This was not intentional.
I had
previously been asked to send this vote to the incubator and ws pmc
lists
and was advised to send it to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as well.
To be honest, I
Sanjiva,
Sorry about violating Apache netiquette. This was not intentional. I had
previously been asked to send this vote to the incubator and ws pmc lists
and was advised to send it to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list as well.
To be honest, I'm feeling pretty lost wrt the correct process to release
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 13:54 -0500, Lawrence Mandel wrote:
> *note: I'm resending this message as I don't believe it showed up on
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lawrence please don't send to general@ and a private list (the PMC
lists). That's against Apache email netiquette ..
Unless I am mistaken your mail
David N. Welton wrote:
> [ changed subject to discuss topic more abstractly ]
>
> > I would agree with this if there was no immediate percieved benefit
> > when you are in Incubator, unfortunately it seems projects under
> > incubation are still perceived by the larger community as endorsed by
> >
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:45:52PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Although TMC is fairly bland (and therefore, fine ;-) I rather like both
> of the proposed alternatives. Kowa, unlike alot of other Native American
> names proposed on this list, is simply the name for a structure, so I don't
Stein, Neil S wrote:
Hi,
It'd be
nice to have an alternative."
Point taken An alternate would be "Ohana" --->
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohana
Although TMC is fairly bland (and therefore, fine ;-) I rather like both
of the proposed alternatives. Kowa, unlike alot of other Native Am
Hi,
>>It'd be
>>nice to have an alternative."
Point taken An alternate would be "Ohana" --->
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohana
Neil Stein
Enterprise Web Infrastructure
phone -- 908-423-4297
--
Notice: This e-mai
Hola,
> and I would like to propose "Kowa"
> "An Apache dwelling consisting of a dome shaped frame of cottonwood or other
> poles, and thatched with grass. The house itself was termed, Kowa and the
> grass thatch, Pi".
Mmm... We've had some discussions [1, and numerous others] in the past
about u
At Merck, the name TMC originally stood for "Tomcat Management Console" As
the tool set evolved, the ability to manage Apache httpd was added. The
full name simply was changed to "The Management Console". The g2 is a Merck
item and should very well be dropped. We have been evaluating other
Raphaël Luta wrote:
> I completely understand that you're not a toolkit company
> however I can't understand why the AjaxTk is currently in
> such a sore open-source state:
> - the code dumps on the site are not functional out of the
> box
To be precise, all of the toolkit (widgets, utils, etc)
*note: I'm resending this message as I don't believe it showed up on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lawrence Mandel
Following the release process for projects in incubation, I'd like to
request approval for Woden to declare milestone 3. A vote was held on the
woden-dev list where M3 received 5 +1 votes a
+1, of course. :)
--
Andy Clark * Zimbra * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
What's the status of the vote? I'm confused by calls to repeal the vote
and modifications to the vote and all that. I thought we were spsed to
be a simple bunch of, um, people but it sure doesn't look like it! ;-)
Overview of what occurred:
1) on 12/20, Adam Peller
+1
On 1/24/06, Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:30:57AM -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KabukiProposal
> >
> > Contents of proposal reproduced below:
>
>
> +1 from me.
>
> - Leo
>
> -
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> Hi Raphael,
>
>
>>I would agree with this if there was no immediate percieved benefit
>>when you are in Incubator, unfortunately it seems projects under
>>incubation are still perceived by the larger community as endorsed by
>>Apache.
>
>
> If that's indeed the prob
On 1/22/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is also good to try to ensure that discussion has settled down, and that
> there is a consensus before calling for the vote. I generally believe that
> a good ASF vote isn't called to make a decision; it is called to ratify one.
Exactly.
Hi Raphael,
> I would agree with this if there was no immediate percieved benefit
> when you are in Incubator, unfortunately it seems projects under
> incubation are still perceived by the larger community as endorsed by
> Apache.
If that's indeed the problem then we need to work on clearing up t
David Crossley wrote:
>
> I will 'svn ci' my generated xdocs into site/xdocs2
>
> It would be good if some other people can look
> over the new source docs and the Anakia side of things.
> The more that we can get the forrest export to do
> the better.
>
> However we need to trade that off with
On 23 Jan 2006, at 14:30, Sam Ruby wrote:
== 1. Scope of the subprojects ==
The initial scope of the project will include client-side widgets and
other utilities from the Zimbra AjaxTK, as described in 0.1.
OK.
In addition, the Kabuki project will also include server-side
infrastructure to
Andrew Clark wrote:
> Raphaël Luta wrote:
>
>>Seeing Zimbra current OSS efforts with this toolkit
>>(even with an ASF member in their team), I have a hard
>>time believing this proposal is anything but a branding
>>exercise to help this toolkit stand out in the crowd of
>>Ajax toolkits.
>
On Jan 23, 2006, at 4:38 AM, Raphaël Luta wrote:
XMLBeans had only 1 member/committer from the beginning but not
affiliated
with the sponsor.
Steven Noels and I were the ASF members involved with XMLBeans and
neither of us was employed by BEA. The initial list of committers
included 3
[ changed subject to discuss topic more abstractly ]
> I would agree with this if there was no immediate percieved benefit
> when you are in Incubator, unfortunately it seems projects under
> incubation are still perceived by the larger community as endorsed by
> Apache.
I think that the further
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 13:38 +0100, Raphaël Luta wrote:
>
>>Seeing Zimbra current OSS efforts with this toolkit (even with an ASF member
>>in their team), I have a hard time believing this proposal is anything but a
>>branding exercise to help this toolkit stand out in
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 08:30:57AM -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KabukiProposal
>
> Contents of proposal reproduced below:
+1 from me.
- Leo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
Heh.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:59:04PM -0800, Brian McCallister wrote:
> The DB PMC would like to ask that the Axion incubation resources be
> removed and that Axion no longer be considered in incubation.
Right. So, ehm. Like Noel already said a few times. Update the status
page and talk to in
29 matches
Mail list logo
