Martin van den Bemt wrote:
How do you fit in / are going to fit in with
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/atf/ ?
Zimbra is mentioned there.
If you look closely, that proposal closely matches the diffs between the
first draft and second draft of the AJAX Toolkit Proposal that was
presented her
How do you fit in / are going to fit in with
http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/atf/ ?
Zimbra is mentioned there.
Mvgr,
Martin
Andrew Clark wrote:
I have made a few modifications to the Ajax proposal
Wiki page[1] in an attempt to resolve a few of the
issues people have raised. The changes includ
thx
David Crossley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I thought there would be xdocs from the cwiki I could grab - otherwise,
I need to convert the html to xdoc.
I will 'svn ci' my generated xdocs into site/xdocs2
It would be good if some other people can look
over the new source docs and the A
will do. If anyone *else* wants to do it, please go ahead and update
the wiki as well.
Last time, i specifically asked for people to look there and no one
did till it hit the [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a VOTE :(
thanks,
dims
On 1/20/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dims,
>
> It appears
Dims,
It appears that we need more discussion on this issues. I think that we can
reach consensus on some; perhaps not on others.
Do you want to summarize the feedback on the wiki, so that we can revise?
--- Noel
-
To
