Responding to some issues that people have with the
layout of the current forrest-based website.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~crossley/incubator-forrest/
If you want me to implement any of these immediately
then say so.
Get rid of PDF
--
There was a PDF generated for every page. The
Here is the result of my experiment ...
[1] http://people.apache.org/~crossley/incubator-anakia/
The existing Incubator site was converted to
Anakia xdoc format. I used a local copy of Geir's
previous experiment [2] but with the forrest-generated
anakia xdocs.
We can tweak the Forrest plugin to
On 1/18/06, Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:45:49PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> > David N. Welton wrote:
> >
> > > I guess it should be placed on the wiki? I'll do that later today if no
> > > one else beats me to it.
> >
> > Here we go:
> >
> > http:/
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:45:49PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> David N. Welton wrote:
>
> > I guess it should be placed on the wiki? I'll do that later today if no
> > one else beats me to it.
>
> Here we go:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
>
> I changed the proposed spo
Dumb question. Are the completion dates on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/roller.html when the event
happened, or when it was marked as complete.
ie) to start ticking these things off, do I need to go do mailing list
audits etc to figure out when things happen, or can I just put today's
date
Hi Geir (and all),
my name is Jacopo Cappellato, I'm one of the developers of the OFBiz
project and, as you can imagine, I'm very interested in your feedback
about our request to join the ASF Incubator.
About the proposal posted to the Wiki instead of to this list... well if
you go to the fi
Here's another starter installment for the "Incubator Guidelines
Documentation" project Noel posted at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200512.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Several times during derby's incubation I felt disoriented because while
there's a lot of info on the
On 18.01.2006, at 02:37, Erik Abele wrote:
On 18.01.2006, at 02:32, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I had read that guide, but it seems geared toward existing projects
wasn't clear what to do in the case of a new project in the
incubator.
You are right, this manual is a bit thin on details for incubat
+1 for going ahead with the milestone release.
Sanjiva.
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 09:09 +, Paul Fremantle wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The Synapse incubator would like to make a Milestone 1 release. We proposed
> this in December, with a successful vote from the WS PMC.
>
> We have read the guidelines
> h
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
> 'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community.
+1
But let's try to say such things to be educational, not chastising.
--- Noel
On 18.01.2006, at 02:32, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I had read that guide, but it seems geared toward existing projects
wasn't clear what to do in the case of a new project in the incubator.
You are right, this manual is a bit thin on details for incubator-
related projects.
Shall I send the emai
I had read that guide, but it seems geared toward existing projects
wasn't clear what to do in the case of a new project in the incubator.
Shall I send the email to root? Or do I need a PMC to do so?
What is the relevant PMC... Lucene or the Incubator? (Solr is going
to be a sub-project of Lucene
[changed subject line though I don't intend to have a big discussion
about this topic]
On 18.01.2006, at 00:16, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki?
(or "@)#!)#@ wiki", as I tend to think of them...)
Can we please have things go to the
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki? (or
> "@)#!)#@ wiki", as I tend to think of them...)
>
> Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
> 'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community. Feel free to
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 07:16, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Does anyone else feel this way? Mail archives will live for years in
> distributed places. Wiki's seem to be single-sourced and a lot more
> ephemeral
Yes. As the primary tool of communication for myself and many others, mails
a
Please follow guidelines here :
http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter
thanks
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: January 17, 2006 5:40:44 PM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [jira] Created: (INFRA-677) create accounts for new
committer
David Crossley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I thought all of it was pretty much done except for the project pages in
cwiki, but you said those are HTML, so just waiting for a shipment of
Round Tuits
Yes but Anakia doesn't deal with HTML, does it?
Right - so I have to convert them a
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> I thought all of it was pretty much done except for the project pages in
> cwiki, but you said those are HTML, so just waiting for a shipment of
> Round Tuits
Yes but Anakia doesn't deal with HTML, does it?
I am not sure what you were waiting for. I think
that we
Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki? (or
"@)#!)#@ wiki", as I tend to think of them...)
Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community. Feel free to
also have on a wiki for collaborat
I have made a few modifications to the Ajax proposal
Wiki page[1] in an attempt to resolve a few of the
issues people have raised. The changes include:
* Changed name to "Kabuki"
* Added text to clarify the scope of the project
Please let me know if there are any other issues that
should be addre
Yoav Shapira wrote:
>> natural preference towards Japanese names, though,
>> so I'll suggest "Kabuki". :)
>
> Kabuki is not bad, though somewhat old-fashioned, no?
I guess I'm an old-fashioned kind of guy. :) Actually,
my favorite traditional Japanese art is bunraku even
though I (sadly) have not
I thought all of it was pretty much done except for the project pages in
cwiki, but you said those are HTML, so just waiting for a shipment of
Round Tuits
Sounds cool, though.
geir
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
I am investigating creating a Forrest output plugin
to do the
how about "AJAX"?
:)
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hola,
I'll chime in with some name ideas just for consideration ;)
And fwiw, I like 'Jambaloo' as a name but probably that's just me ;-)
Mmm, yeah, maybe that's just you ;)
natural preference towards Japanese names, though,
so I'll suggest "Kabuki"
Hola,
I'll chime in with some name ideas just for consideration ;)
> >> And fwiw, I like 'Jambaloo' as a name but probably that's just me ;-)
Mmm, yeah, maybe that's just you ;)
> natural preference towards Japanese names, though,
> so I'll suggest "Kabuki". :)
Kabuki is not bad, though somewha
Andrew Clark wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
And fwiw, I like 'Jambaloo' as a name but probably that's just me ;-)
Andy, any preference?
I don't have any particular preference in regards to
the name. If people have a problem with AjaxTk being
too broad, then any other name will do. I have a
natural
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Andrew Clark wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I see .java files - that has nothing to do with AJAX,
so I'm sort of confused. I'd be expecting to see, well,
only JavaScript.
[...]
If it has .java files, it isn't a 'client library'. So,
I want to make sure we clarify where
--On January 17, 2006 11:36:23 AM -0800 Andrew Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
While this submission starts with the primary widget
toolkit needed to start building AJAX applications, there
is a need for server-side code to complete the model. And
Java is a natural solution for this part and i
Tobago came through with its report.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status report for the Apache Incubator Project
==
The Incubator continues to see good progress in a number of projects and
their communities.
Several items of note from this past quarter:
We have had some discussion regarding the rate of growth, how
Raphaël Luta wrote:
> along with [a] codebase come an established group of committers
> with an interest in keeping their current architecture or at
> least backward compatibility
That carries a fairly large assumption, and really should be posed as a
question, not an answer.
> An established co
With five +1 votes, one +0, and no negative votes, the Solr project has
been accepted into the Incubator. As a Mentor, I will now work with the
committers to get things going.
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Cooper wrote:
> the incubator operates as an open door to whoever knocks,
> with virtually no entry criteria.
The criteria is that another PMC votes or the Incubator PMC votes. In the
latter case, we should be looking to see interest from the Membership. In
numerous cases, I can think of
Status report for the Apache Incubator Project
==
The Incubator continues to see good progress in a number of projects and
their communities.
Several items of note from this past quarter:
We have had some discussion regarding the rate of growth, how
Hi folks,
First off, I would like to thank everyone for taking interest in the ajax
toolkit incubator proposal and for the time folks are taking in providing
feedback. From reading the various postings, there seems to be three areas of
concern:
1) Project name. The issue here seems to be tha
This second posting has a revised Roller report, and the WSRP4J report.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> I see .java files - that has nothing to do with AJAX,
> so I'm sort of confused. I'd be expecting to see, well,
> only JavaScript.
> [...]
> If it has .java files, it isn't a 'client library'. So,
> I want to make sure we clarify where the boundaries are,
> so stupi
Sam Ruby wrote:
>> And fwiw, I like 'Jambaloo' as a name but probably that's just me ;-)
>
> Andy, any preference?
I don't have any particular preference in regards to
the name. If people have a problem with AjaxTk being
too broad, then any other name will do. I have a
natural preference towards J
Status report for the Apache Incubator Project
The Incubator continues to see good progress in a number of projects and
their communities.
Several items of note from this past quarter:
We have had some discussion regarding the rate of growth, ho
+1 on the proposal. I am assuming that the project
will not have a generic technology name (Roy's point)
but I'm not withholding my vote for that.
On Jan 16, 2006, at 9:12 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
On 16.01.2006, at 02:42, Sam Ruby wrote:
The discussion has died down, and the time
+1
On Jan 10, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project,
which bodes well for its ability to build a developer community.
The Lucene PMC would be happy to acce
- Original Message -
From: "David N. Welton (JIRA)"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 5:12 PM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-12) Process_Description.html
navigation improvement
|[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-12?page=comments#action_12362832
]
|
| Davi
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-13?page=all ]
Gavin updated INCUBATOR-13:
---
Attachment: faq.xml.diff
Added points raised on list. Hope this is correct and in a suitable place,
please check before comitting.
> Add new content to faq
>
Add new content to faq
--
Key: INCUBATOR-13
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-13
Project: Incubator
Type: Improvement
Reporter: Gavin
Priority: Minor
Mentioned on list, extra bullet points added to clarify initial code
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 14:27, Martin Cooper wrote:
> And the impact of giving a project the ASF brand. And the way the incubator
> operates as an open door to whoever knocks, with virtually no entry
> criteria.
This seems to be a recurring (growing?) concern among people 'inside' ASF.
Perhaps
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 18:00, Raphaël Luta wrote:
Since you placed this in a separate paragraph, I must comment of it
independently of the rest of your post;
> An established codebase is *much* more difficult to restructure
> than starting from scratch.
Not by default.
for FILE in `ls | gr
Hi,
It seems to me like this vote is now closed, with a positive outcome,
no further action in about a week. Unless I missed something, will
the originator of the vote please send out a [VOTE][RESULT] email with
a tally? ;)
Yoav
On 1/11/06, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/11/06, J
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:00:06AM +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Friday 13 January 2006 04:27, David E. Jones wrote:
> > As I understand it in order to become a top level project the Board ?
> > must be the sponsor, which is why the proposal was written that way. ?
>
> That is a misconception.
David Crossley wrote:
>
> I am investigating creating a Forrest output plugin
> to do the complete conversion. If Geir or others
> come up with another solution then fine, this will
> still be a useful tool for Forrest.
Update: We now have a Forrest output plugin working to
generate Anakia xdocs
Raphaël Luta wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
Oh, of course - but for now there's no community yet so he is
complaining into the blue sky :)
I'd certainly like to see a response to the concerns raised by Martin
but OTOH I don't think that it should evolve into a discussion about
basic architectural
Erik Abele wrote:
>
> Oh, of course - but for now there's no community yet so he is
> complaining into the blue sky :)
>
> I'd certainly like to see a response to the concerns raised by Martin
> but OTOH I don't think that it should evolve into a discussion about
> basic architectural principl
Hi!
The Synapse incubator would like to make a Milestone 1 release. We proposed
this in December, with a successful vote from the WS PMC.
We have read the guidelines
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
and understand these.
The codebase has enough functionalit
51 matches
Mail list logo
