I have prepared a Wiki page to help prepare this quarter's board report.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IncubatorBoardReport2006Q1
Please edit your section by FRIDAY, JANUARY 13, 2006.
Every project is expected to provide a quarterly report. If I missed a
section, you are still required to
I must apologise for not doing sending in a notice prior to doing the commit.
I sent in a software grant for http://www.osjava.org/norbert/ a couple
of weeks back. Jim recorded it. It had previously been voted as
becoming a part of Jakarta HttpComponents. I hold all the IP, and have
a ICLA and CCL
On 12/29/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/28/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I was browsing the ip-clearance documents
> > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/).
> > IMNSHO, I don't like what
+0 (would be +1 but I am trying not to +1 anything which I cannot
commit time to help with)
I will use it, though =)
-Brian
On Jan 10, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
+1 from me.
Yoav
On 1/10/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is as clear as day: +1.
Otis
Hi,
+1 from me.
Yoav
On 1/10/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is as clear as day: +1.
>
> Otis
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue 10 Jan 2006 12:21:49 PM EST
> Subject: [VOTE] accept Solr
This is as clear as day: +1.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue 10 Jan 2006 12:21:49 PM EST
Subject: [VOTE] accept Solr into incubator
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
Discussion
Paul Querna wrote:
I would be interested in helping out with Solr.
Great! Would you like to be a mentor and/or an initial committer?
Next Steps?
The next step is to get some +1 votes from the Incubator PMC in the VOTE
thread. Once that vote successfully completes then we can start settin
On 1/10/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
> and get them down either as comitters and/or
> Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
> them from the proposal?
I didn't list any mentors myself on the proposal beca
Ian Holsman wrote:
I'd be interested in participating in this as well.
(Disclosure: I am currently employed by CNET, just in a completely
different area)
Great! Would you like to be a mentor and/or an initial committer?
Doug
-
--On January 10, 2006 2:29:25 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But what I expect to see more often is that the incubator raises specific
concerns with a new proposal that the presenters are willing to remedy,
and that the sponsoring PMC didn't anticipate. That would b
Totally agree with Justin straight down the line. One additional thought;
-1 / No:
- Petition the Board to require Incubator PMC VOTE to begin incubation
process even for projects that other PMC's want to sponsor.
Now, we are the Board's committee to found new projects. That said, we can't
Doug Cutting wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > (a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
> > and get them down either as comitters and/or
> > Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
> > them from the proposal?
> None whatsoever. If their statements of willingness
--On January 10, 2006 3:11:28 PM -0500 Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
I mentioned I'd be interested, I still am. I'd like to be a committer
(I think I am automatically, at least through the incubation period,
by virtue of being on the Incubator PMC), but it seemed to me like
At
Hi,
I mentioned I'd be interested, I still am. I'd like to be a committer
(I think I am automatically, at least through the incubation period,
by virtue of being on the Incubator PMC), but it seemed to me like
having the entire Lucene PMC group as mentors was enough, so I didn't
add myself as a me
--On December 31, 2005 2:38:48 PM -0500 Davanum Srinivas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
Please review the items here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProposedChanges
Please feel free to add/modify/delete or start a new thread here on
any issue that you care about. Let's give it a week and
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
(a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
and get them down either as comitters and/or
Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
them from the proposal?
None whatsoever. If their statements of willingness to help meant that
they'd like to be
Garrett Rooney wrote:
I believe there were a few people from outside the Lucene PMC who
volunteered (Paul Querna did, and perhaps some others), it seems
useful to get people from other parts of the ASF involved, just to
encourage cross pollination of ideas.
That would be great. I did not under
Doug,
I saw a number of ASF folks expressing interesting in participating. My
quick take is that:
(a) you should identify the additional ASF folks,
and get them down either as comitters and/or
Mentors. Was there a reason for excluding
them from the proposal?
(b) the Lucen
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I don't see Erik listed on the proposal as a mentor. -- justin
I just added him.
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/10/06, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > Are there any other mentors? I think I saw some people say they would be
> > interested, but I don't see their names on the proposal. -- justin
>
> Erik Hatcher & myself are mentors. Do we need more?
I believe th
--On January 10, 2006 11:51:33 AM -0800 Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Are there any other mentors? I think I saw some people say they would be
interested, but I don't see their names on the proposal. -- justin
Erik Hatcher & myself are mentors. Do we nee
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Doug, you can only make this statement with a vote by the Lucene PMC.
The Lucene PMC has already voted to sponsor this podling. My
understanding is that the Incubator PMC must also vote to accept the
podling. Is that not correct?
Doug
-
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Are there any other mentors? I think I saw some people say they would be
interested, but I don't see their names on the proposal. -- justin
Erik Hatcher & myself are mentors. Do we need more?
Doug
Doug Cutting wrote:
The Lucene PMC would be happy to accept Solr as a Lucene sub-project
once it graduates from the incubator.
Doug, you can only make this statement with a vote by the Lucene PMC. I'd
suggest that the Lucene PMC vote on incubating the proposal. In doing so,
the Lucene proje
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 09:21:49AM -0800, Doug Cutting wrote:
> I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
>
> Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project, which
> bodes well for its ability to build a developer community.
>
> The Lucene PMC would b
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project, which
bodes well for its ability to build a developer community.
The Lucene PMC would be happy to accept Solr as a Lucene sub-project
once it graduates from t
On Jan 10, 2006, at 12:42 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 11:15:25PM -0800, Roy Fielding wrote:
The proposal was voted +1 by four of the most over-committed
members of
the ASF. The mentors are already mentoring other podlings. Mads
offered
to mentor as well, which seem
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 11:30:01PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> A final concern was raised, TMCg2 stands for (???). I've read it as 'The
> Management Console generation 2'. Now from an OSS standpoint, there's no
> first generation, so I'd suggest dropping the g2 designation. But was I
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
