APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2005-11-24 00:30:24 -0500 (Thu, 24 Nov 2005) $]
Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/
Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
[note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki
On 1/4/06, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
>
> > Martin Cooper wrote:
> > > Personally, I would prefer that the ASF not accept _any_ AJAX
> > > framework at this point in time. The area is relatively new
> > > and in a great deal of flux right now, and "crowning"
On 1/4/06, Dan Diephouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Martin Cooper wrote:
> > On 1/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with
> >> the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??
> >>
On Jan 4, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Roy, what happens if I have a codebase, and I have one file in it that
imports or otherwise references third party GPL code, and I then
delete my
infected file? Do we have a concern about having that GPL infected
code in
SVN, even though it
Dan Diephouse wrote:
> Martin Cooper wrote:
> > Personally, I would prefer that the ASF not accept _any_ AJAX
> > framework at this point in time. The area is relatively new
> > and in a great deal of flux right now, and "crowning" one of
> > them with the ASF brand will create a de facto standard
Martin Cooper wrote:
On 1/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with
the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??
I don't believe there is a sponsoring PMC at this point.
Persona
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 06:21:28PM -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>...
> Roy, what happens if I have a codebase, and I have one file in it that
> imports or otherwise references third party GPL code, and I then delete my
> infected file? Do we have a concern about having that GPL infected code in
>
On 1/4/06, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with
> the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??
I don't believe there is a sponsoring PMC at this point.
Personally, I would prefer that th
--On January 5, 2006 4:32:46 AM +0600 Sanjiva Weerawarana
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with
the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??
Noe one has called for a vote. -- justin
> Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
> history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling
> brings code over?
It is still being debated, so no. Roy's comments about import from private
vs public repositories may be a reasonable approach. Personally, I'm a
So .. amidst all of our soul searching .. what'd we decide to do with
the Ajax proposal from IBM et al.?? Did I miss the vote and decision??
Sanjiva.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >What is happening now? There was a flurry of +1 from
> >PMC members. What is the next step in moving to Anakia?
>
> I was going to do the /project docs (as they seem to be critical).
>
> At that point, I think all is there, and we could go forwa
--On January 4, 2006 1:53:03 PM + Ross Gardler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Installation of Forrest is as easy as Anakia, if not eaiser (download,
unpack) and has the same pre-requisites.
Uh. No. anakia was always bundled with the sites directly. We (meaning
the non-Java folks) *never*
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 22:40, Jules Gosnell wrote:
> Isn't the incubator meant to lower the bar for projects wishing to
> migrate into ASF ?
Not directly. Incubator is the buffer that is here to ensure that the ASF, its
members and to some degree its committers are given a low legal risk. Tha
I know of at least half a dozen private implementations of exactly
this. I definitely would like to see some common cause oon it.
Will read proposal in more detail tomorrow morning!
-Brian
On Jan 3, 2006, at 7:19 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a
So how does this work? Does the incubator also need to vote on this
or is it accepted for incubation based on the Lucene PMC vote?
I'm +1, for the record :)
Erik
On Jan 3, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a new Apache proje
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 1/4/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is a way to use Forrest itself to produce
xml output ...
0)
Assuming that forrest is installed as per:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
i've been following th
On 1/4/06, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is a way to use Forrest itself to produce
> xml output ...
>
>
> 0)
> Assuming that forrest is installed as per:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
i've been following this debate (off and o
David Crossley wrote:
What is happening now? There was a flurry of +1 from
PMC members. What is the next step in moving to Anakia?
I was going to do the /project docs (as they seem to be critical).
At that point, I think all is there, and we could go forward. I may be
inspired today to put
David Crossley wrote:
Geir's experiment was incomplete and he reported
difficulty with some docs. Perhaps the following
will help, or perhaps you already have a better
solution.
I just want people to stay informed over here. You can see David is keen
to support your move away from Forrest, I'
Jules Gosnell wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Jules Gosnell wrote:
>>
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>>
Sorry to change the subject...
Can someone make a definitive statement on whether or not code
history is brought into our repo from elsewhere when a podling
>>>
21 matches
Mail list logo
