On 12/5/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/5/05, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Roy T.Fielding wrote:
> > >
> > > No, the proposal is all about SOA. What you are saying is that the
> > > *actual plan* is about SCA. What I am saying is that the proposal
> > Specifically, I think the goal of providing a language/platform
> > neutral service assembly layer that's backed by an extensible set of
> > app developer models (with a shared conceptual framework) for specific
> > languages/technologies, is something distinct here. Stuff like
> > figuring ou
I'm assuming the DB PMC can vote...
+1
David
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
(sorry if you see this a second time... I never saw the first one...)
I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a vote.
There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two weeks, so
I'll a
+1 (non-binding) We're excited to be considered for graduation into the DB TLP.CraigOn Dec 4, 2005, at 7:41 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a vote. There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two weeks, so I'll assume that peo
On 12/5/05, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Roy T.Fielding wrote:
> >
> > No, the proposal is all about SOA. What you are saying is that the
> > *actual plan* is about SCA. What I am saying is that the proposal
> > needs to match the actual plan, preferably a plan that is actionable,
On 12/5/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I repurposed the discussion thread for continuity to call for a
> vote. There has been no concern or objection noted in the last two
> weeks, so I'll assume that people are comfortable with this.
>
> So what say ye?
>
> [ ] +1 Graduate
