On 8/7/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please note that although we have attempted to establish a balanced policy,
> it is not our goal to have widespread adoption of projects that are still in
> the Incubator. We want projects to be making a focused effort to get out of
> the In
Leo Simons wrote:
> Otherwise, people just copy-paste a maven project.xml snippet
> and never realise what they have is not "official" apache
> stuff (yet). We don't want that.
Correct, we most certainly do not.
In fact, there was recently a similar problem with an existing project and
an unoffi
On 07-08-2005 05:41, "Craig Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> If the group name is intended to reflect the actual root package name, then
>>> org.apache.jdo would seem correct. If it's not, perhaps someone can offer
>>> some pointers to where the discussion took place so I could understand it
