Hi,Thanks for the useful feedback.The dotted notation is news to me but makes a lot of sense. I'll study the reading materials and ask questions if it's too hard to suss out.On Aug 5, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Brett Porter wrote:On 8/6/05, Craig Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It'd be great if you can p
Will do.
On 8/6/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett,
>
> Would you please write this up as general instructions for Incubator
> projects, and we can add it to the web-site?
>
> --- Noel
>
>
> -
> To
Brett,
Would you please write this up as general instructions for Incubator
projects, and we can add it to the web-site?
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
On 8/6/05, Craig Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It'd be great if you can put them up at cvs.apache.org, maybe under a
> group of org.apache.incubator.jdo?
>
> I don't understand what this means. I don't know how, or don't have
> privileges to, publish anything except via svn.
Sorry, when r
Craig Russell wrote:
> Brett Porter wrote:
> > http://cvs.apache.org/repository is not synced to ibiblio.
> I don't understand what this means in terms of our ability
> to put jdo snapshots into ibiblio
It means that you don't. Brett provided the publically available repository
that can be used
Hi Brett,On Aug 5, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Brett Porter wrote:Hi Brian,http://cvs.apache.org/repository is not synced to ibiblio. We'veremoved all snapshots from ibiblio's Maven2 repository (thoughretaining them in the original maven one for backwards compatibility).I don't understand what this means in
Hi Brian,
http://cvs.apache.org/repository is not synced to ibiblio. We've
removed all snapshots from ibiblio's Maven2 repository (though
retaining them in the original maven one for backwards compatibility).
It'd be great if you can put them up at cvs.apache.org, maybe under a
group of org.apach
Is it okay for the (incubating) jdo project to post snapshots to the
maven repository at ibiblio via the cvs.apache.org repo?
The only catch is figuring a good way to label it as in incubation.
One option is to include it the artifact id, so it would be something
like:
jdo2-incubating-2.0
Thx.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Where BTW do I find the sources to mod_mbox? ;-)
You can grab it from SVN at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_mbox/trunk/
-garrett
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
Where BTW do I find the sources to mod_mbox? ;-)
Regards
Henning
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 11:32 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > While mod_mbox is ok for browsing[,] eyebrowse offers more
> > functionality (like searching, sorting by author e.g.)
>
> Supposedly, mod_mbox i
> While mod_mbox is ok for browsing[,] eyebrowse offers more
> functionality (like searching, sorting by author e.g.)
Supposedly, mod_mbox is being enhanced.
> Where is the problem with eyebrowse? Noone looking after it?
It has some problems, and since mod_mbox is being enhanced, we were going t
He still got a point though. While mod_mbox is ok for browsing (however
the index seems to be breakable just like with eyebrowse, see e.g.
INFRA-480), eyebrowse offers more functionality (like searching, sorting
by author e.g.)
Where is the problem with eyebrowse? Noone looking after it?
There seems to be a couple of gotchas with the
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox archive
- The archiver's view of time is skewed compared to the mail message's
time stamp (timezone offset?), so you get some messages appearing in the
'wrong' month. For example [1] is the list of messages on
14 matches
Mail list logo
