Re: [proposal] Oscar OSGi Project

2005-07-16 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Sunday 17 July 2005 02:45, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > OSGi specifications are free to implement. > > > Like the RFC process the specifications are crafted by a closed > > group. However anyone can implement these specifications. > > I don't see how you came to that conclusion. I think I would g

Re: Incubator projects lacking disclaimers?

2005-07-16 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
I'll fix harmony. There was no intention to mislead - it's why I put the incubator logo prominently on the right side from the get-go. On Jul 14, 2005, at 11:10 AM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote: The Incubator policy page is very clear that: 'Podlings are, by definition, not yet fully accept

Re: [proposal] Oscar OSGi Project

2005-07-16 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Jul 15, 2005, at 11:34 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: Roy T. Fielding wrote: The OSGi community appears, from their own materials, to be a closed-circle consortium with a RAND-based cross-licensing agreement to members, in which OSGi's ability to license invented materials is limited to licenses to

Re: [proposal] Oscar OSGi Project

2005-07-16 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Jul 15, 2005, at 7:45 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote: As a matter of fact let me ask right now with a request to infrastructure for these dev lists. Could the [EMAIL PROTECTED] be created soon? Done. Roy - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Derby 10.1 incubating release

2005-07-16 Thread Roy T. Fielding
On Jul 16, 2005, at 12:39 AM, Andrew McIntyre wrote: On behalf of the Derby development community, I'd like to request permission to post the files you can find here: http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/derby_10.1/ as an incubating release on the Derby website. The big news for this release i

Re: **** QUARTERLY REPORTS DUE ****

2005-07-16 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On July 12, 2005 8:35:41 AM -0400 "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just a reminder: quarterly reports are due from all incubating projects by Friday. (Been on the road on my way to AC.) stdcxx: Mailing lists have been created, initial accounts have been created for the stdcxx c

Derby committer update - WAS Re: [VOTE] Derby 10.1 incubating release

2005-07-16 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > ++1. It's great to see Derby's progress as a community! Thanks for following up and the compliment!! > I'd encourage your ppmc, as you stop to celebrate the completion > of this milestone, to look around at the other contributors to the > latest efforts, and consid

Re: [VOTE] Derby 10.1 incubating release

2005-07-16 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 02:39 AM 7/16/2005, Andrew McIntyre wrote: >On behalf of the Derby development community, I'd like to request >permission to post the files you can find here: > >http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/derby_10.1/ > >as an incubating release on the Derby website. Ahhh, I did miss the point of you

Re: stdcxx open for business

2005-07-16 Thread David Crossley
Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Hello stdcxx committers, > > Welcome to the stdcxx project, currently under incubation within the > Apache Incubator. You are responsible for maintaining a status > file at > > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/stdcxx.html > > If you don't have one yet, your first

Re: [VOTE] Derby 10.1 incubating release

2005-07-16 Thread Brian McCallister
+1 (non-binding) -Brian On Jul 16, 2005, at 9:39 AM, Andrew McIntyre wrote: Hello Incubator, On behalf of the Derby development community, I'd like to request permission to post the files you can find here: http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/derby_10.1/ as an incubating release on the Der

Re: Derby 10.1 incubating release

2005-07-16 Thread Daniel John Debrunner
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > At 04:30 PM 7/15/2005, Andrew McIntyre wrote: > >>Andrew McIntyre wrote: >> >>>Hello Incubator, >>> >>>On behalf of the Derby development community, I'd like to request >>>permission to post the files you can find here: >>> >>>http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/der

[VOTE] Derby 10.1 incubating release

2005-07-16 Thread Andrew McIntyre
Hello Incubator, On behalf of the Derby development community, I'd like to request permission to post the files you can find here: http://people.apache.org/~fuzzylogic/derby_10.1/ as an incubating release on the Derby website. The big news for this release is the contribution of the network cli

Re: Derby 10.1 incubating release

2005-07-16 Thread Andrew McIntyre
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Andrew McIntyre wrote: Should I have posted this as a vote, instead of just as a query? Exactly :) Polls can be interesting, but the bottom line is that three ppmc/pmc/members vote to release the code, and you have more +1's than -1's, it's a release plain and si

stdcxx open for business

2005-07-16 Thread Roy T. Fielding
Hello stdcxx committers, Welcome to the stdcxx project, currently under incubation within the Apache Incubator. You are responsible for maintaining a status file at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/stdcxx.html If you don't have one yet, your first task MUST be to create one using some ot

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Beehive into a TLP

2005-07-16 Thread Roy T. Fielding
I believe Beehive is ready to function as a standalone PMC. Please see the latest status at: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html +1 Roy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-