Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 15 July 2005 10:07, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Here's my +1
My non-binding, big +1 as well.
and here another non-binding +1
--
Reinhard Pötz Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach
{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache
Alex Karasulu wrote:
We have established a list for discussions. Unless your comment is directed
to the general Incubator community or the Incubator PMC, please post
everything to :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can subscribe by sending an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Until this proposal has b
On Friday 15 July 2005 10:07, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Here's my +1
My non-binding, big +1 as well.
Cheers
Niclas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh btw the turnout for this is so massive we're getting a trickle of
supporters daily and adding them to the document. Perhaps we can get a
wiki up soon and the dev lists. For the time being here's the document
in subversion:
https://svn.safehaus.org/repos/sandbox/proposals/osgi/osgi-proposa
Here's my +1
-- dims
On 7/14/05, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The OSGi community at large, several Apache committers and members would
> like to start a new project based on the existing Oscar OSGi Container
> which Richard Hall is graciously willing to donate. Without
On Jul 14, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Simon Kitching wrote:
Yes the current discussion on legal-discuss is wrt wss4j, but the
question for beehive was more general: are there any patents that have
been explicitly granted for the use of Beehive?
This is not how the question should be asked. The questio
Hello,
The OSGi community at large, several Apache committers and members would
like to start a new project based on the existing Oscar OSGi Container
which Richard Hall is graciously willing to donate. Without further
commentary we present to you the proposal for the Oscar project:
Project
Yes the current discussion on legal-discuss is wrt wss4j, but the
question for beehive was more general: are there any patents that have
been explicitly granted for the use of Beehive? For example, have BEA
issued any "licenses" to Apache with respect to stuff that Beehive
implements?
Regards,
Si
Beehive doesn't currently have any implementations of the WS-*
standards, including WS-Security -- the intent was to at some point
look to other Apache projects that were implementing those standards
(I don't subscribe to legal-discuss, but I presume the discussion in
question is wrt WSS4J?).
On 7
Here's a summary of Roller status:
Development status
- Work is proceeding on Roller 2.0, which will be ready in August. The
main (and possibly only) new feature of Roller 2.0 will be group
blogging support -- this is a big feature and requires a very large
number of changes to the code base
> On 7/12/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear Incubator PMC,
> >
> > I believe Beehive is ready to function as a standalone PMC. Please
> see
> > the latest status at:
> > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html
Could someone please provide information on any
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Just a reminder: quarterly reports are due from all incubating projects by
Friday.
Here is what Derby has been up to in Q2 (April-June).
Derby added Tomohito Nakayama as a new committer.
[Early Q3 note: two more committers were added and derby-dev is voting
on another.]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/12/05, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Incubator PMC,
>
> I believe Beehive is ready to function as a standalone PMC. Please
see
> the latest status at:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html
+1
- - The Beehiv
Didn't mean to fill everyone's inbox with this message, although I *am*
excited for Beehive to be a fully-integrated part of the Apache
community. Apologies for that spam (and this spam).
Rich
Rich Feit wrote:
Thank you, Craig! We're really looking forward to being part of the
wider Apache
Thank you, Craig! We're really looking forward to being part of the
wider Apache community.
At some point I'd love for us to figure out how page flows and Shale
constructs can play nicely with each other.
Rich
Craig McClanahan wrote:
+1 (Incubator Project Mentor)
The Beehive folks have c
+1 (Incubator Project Mentor)
The Beehive folks have clearly shown they understand "the Apache Way",
and they actually behave that way too. All the necessary i's have
been dotted and the t's have been crossed, and this will be a great
Apache TLP.
Craig McClanahan
On 7/12/05, Davanum Srinivas <
And, I'd thought Beehive had that -- apologies that it's not on the
website; I'll get that corrected this morning.
At least it's on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/beehive/
:)
Thanks for pointing it out.
Eddie
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
The Incubator policy page is very
The Incubator policy page is very clear that:
'Podlings are, by definition, not yet fully accepted as part of the
Apache Software Foundation. Podling web sites MUST include a clear
disclaimer on their website and in all documentation stating that they
are in incubation.'
http://incubator.apache.
On 14-07-2005 04:30, "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/11/05, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 2) How much of the Incubator process would apply to Commons?
All of it.
>> Many of
>> the exit conditions are automatically passed just by being a part of
>> Commons. [http
Or worse yet .. "ex em el beans suxx" ;-).
Sanjiva.
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 16:35 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Good, because I first thought
>
> "ex em el beans ch"
>
> :D
>
> geir
>
> On Jul 12, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >>
20 matches
Mail list logo
