Re: Advice Needed: What do we do about autoresponders?

2005-02-17 Thread David Crossley
Clinton Begin wrote: > Thanks David. > > Unfortunately that FAQ doesn't cover removal of existing members. Yes it does. See the second-last paragraph. The moderators have the power. Normally people would unsubscribe themselves using the [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address. > Is there any informati

Re: Advice Needed: What do we do about autoresponders?

2005-02-17 Thread Clinton Begin
Thanks David. Unfortunately that FAQ doesn't cover removal of existing members. Is there any information about general list administration? Is there a web interface, or is it all command line? Cheers, Clinton On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:06:31 +1100, David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cl

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

2005-02-17 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 17, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote: It seems that the best course of action is for the Lucene PMC to vote whether they want to accept the project for incubation (which they are currently doing), then bring the project into the incubator and try to build up a more sustainable comm

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

2005-02-17 Thread Garrett Rooney
Noel J. Bergman wrote: I'd gladly bring the codebase into Lucene's repository if that is the consensus. It was created entirely by Garrett and he's agreed to donate it, so the IP should be pretty clear cut. Do you have a community for it, or just a place? If this isn't something that the Lucene

RE: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

2005-02-17 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Erik Hatcher wrote: > > On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only >>> to do the required IP checklist. > I'm not sure what is meant by "register the IP stuff here". I'm in an airplane, and can't check the URL, but

Re: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

2005-02-17 Thread Garrett Rooney
Cliff Schmidt wrote: Garrett, You're right that all new code bases should come through the Incubator. However, the appropriate PMC to vote on whether it should be accepted into the incubator is the sponsoring PMC, which in this case appears to be the Lucene PMC. (The Incubator PMC does sponsor som

RE: [PROPOSAL] Lucene4c

2005-02-17 Thread Cliff Schmidt
Garrett, You're right that all new code bases should come through the Incubator. However, the appropriate PMC to vote on whether it should be accepted into the incubator is the sponsoring PMC, which in this case appears to be the Lucene PMC. (The Incubator PMC does sponsor some projects, usually