RE: Making Daffodil Replicator an Open Source : Suggestion

2004-08-20 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Noel, I think that there has been some confusion. Amongst which may be that you were replying to Steven NOELS, and I am NOEL Bergman. :-) --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional comm

Re: Making Daffodil Replicator an Open Source : Suggestion

2004-08-20 Thread Jim Jagielski
A general comment: Whether any developer are paid or not is really immaterial to us; in fact, I would say, quite simply, that the ASF doesn't care at all. The ASF is focused on the efforts of *individual volunteer committers*. *People* are granted committer (and membership) status based on their in

Re: Making Daffodil Replicator an Open Source : Suggestion

2004-08-20 Thread Ashish Srivastava
Dear members, Please find attached our thoughts. >I find this rather confusing. One of the criteria for exiting > incubation is a *diverse* set of committers - i.e. an appropriate > proportion of Daffodil "for-pay" developers but also non-Daffodil > folks. If your idea of the original number of c