Martin,
Sorry if the reply is redundant. In general, you will find a number of
opinions on the topic of infrastructure. I have generally found that the
ASF adapts to the needs of individual projects - some projects use
Subversion and some projects use CVS. Similarly, some projects use Jira and
> Could someone who knows how please add log4cxx and log4pgp to the sidebar
> at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html.
> I have updated the index page but these do not show up, yet.
I don't know what you updated, but this:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/site/projects/in
Martin,
Just to clarify. There are many Java related projects at the ASF. Jakarta
was the original location for many, but you would really be moving to the
ASF, and starting in the Incubator. The final destination could be one of
the existing Java projects, or could be a new top-level project.
> > Specifically, a comment like "it is important to get out official
> > (incubation) release files soon since users and developers are
> > waiting for a release to base their productive environments on"
> > makes me nervous.
> Maybe u missed the word incubation in brackets?
No, I saw it. But I
James Holmes wrote:
> My guess is that it would be best served as a sub-project of Jakarta
Well, I think that Jakarta has enough on its plate, and wouldn't necessarily
favor adding a cohesive community into that maelstrom. But that is
something that can be determined later, when the project is re
On 15.06.2004, at 17:03, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Over here [1] there are some FAQs about Apache.
I think that they are much better to be put here [2].
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html
You mean just the first section, right? Sounds reasonable. W
On 15.06.2004, at 18:32, Marinschek Martin wrote:
Another question - what do we have to change regarding project
infrastructure to enter the incubator/ and later to be a project? Do
we have to embrace Maven or can we somehow ship around this?
The most basic things you'd have to move are source co
I don't think there's ever been a directive to use Maven. We're
investigating it for the Struts build, but for now Ant is still our
official build tool.
If you do *choose* to use Maven, I believe the project still needs to be
able to be built from Ant for Gump and nightly builds. Maven has a
targe
I'd also support sponsoring this project through Struts PMC or Jakarta
PMC. I'm not involved in Geronimo, but have no problems if it's brought
on board via that route.
If I can help in any practical way, I will.
Steve
> -Original Message-
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another question - what do we have to change regarding project infrastructure to enter
the incubator/ and later to be a project? Do we have to embrace Maven or can we
somehow ship around this?
Martin
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15
The vote is currently happening and we have 6 positive votes and one "ok, if it has to
be" ;) so far...
We started to vote today, so I would give the others some time to make their point
clear, afterwards we can go ahead.
Best regards,
Martin
-Original Message-
From: James Holmes [ma
My guess is that it would be best served as a sub-project of Jakarta,
however, I'm somewhat indifferent. If necessary, I presume it could be
moved to another "home" later.
BTW, are all we waiting on is a formal license adoption from all of the
current MyFaces committers to get started?
-James
-
> Over here [1] there are some FAQs about Apache.
> I think that they are much better to be put here [2].
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html
> [2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html
You mean just the first section, right? Sounds reasonable. With a link
from the incubator page to t
On Jun 15, 2004, at 2:46 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Mind you, building an end-user community is not an incubation
priority. We
care about IP and development community, and the latter ought to be
able to
participate directly from source control. Specifically, a comment
like "it
is important to
+1
+1
from me.
> Hey there,
>
> I have started asking at Apache Incubator if there is any interest to get
> MyFaces up and running as an Apache sub-project; and the interest is not
> too small.
>
> The guys at Apache incubator would need us to change the license of
> MyFaces to an Apache style
On Jun 15, 2004, at 1:14 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Martin,
Fine to hear that some interest is there!
So far, I have heard from Dain Sundstrom (Geronimo) and James Holmes
(Struts) that they are interested in participating on a MyFaces PPMC.
I
expect we'll hear from others, and ought to be able to
Hello,
Could someone who knows how please add log4cxx and log4pgp to the sidebar
at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html.
I have updated the index page but these do not show up, yet. (One would
need to run forrest which I do not know how to do.)
Many thanks in advance,
--
Ceki Gülcü
On 14 Jun 2004, at 23:07, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see one or two quantitative rules (such as one
about independent committers to allow for vetoes)
IMHO, that would be a requirement for projects prior to *entering* the
incubator.
--
Steven Noelshtt
Hey there,
I have started asking at Apache Incubator if there is any interest to get MyFaces up
and running as an Apache sub-project; and the interest is not too small.
The guys at Apache incubator would need us to change the license of MyFaces to an
Apache style license and to assign someone w
Over here [1] there are some FAQs about Apache.
I think that they are much better to be put here [2].
WDOT?
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/faq.html
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/faq.html
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
Ok, as to the community:
The community consists mainly of independent developers. As far as I know, only the
two founder members and me are working together on a project in an Austrian bank (the
OeKB "Austrian Control Bank", free translation ;), but two of us are freelancers and
have founded ou
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 08:46, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Leo Simons wrote:
> > Noel, have your concerns been addressed?
>
> I think so. They've been addressed in that they've been discussed. Steven
> has been watching Lenya closely, particularly recently, and seems convinced
> that there has been a
22 matches
Mail list logo
