Re: contributions and CLAs

2004-05-06 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > CLAs are not required for each bug fix. They are required for > substantial contributors over a period of time, i.e., committers. Many of our contributions aren't bug fixes or patches, but new rules (some are rather large sets of rules) which could be cons

RE: contributions and CLAs

2004-05-06 Thread Cliff Schmidt
Sam Ruby wrote on Thursday, May 06, 2004 4:28 AM: > Justin Mason wrote: >> Hi incubator folks -- >> >> I'm one of the PMC and devs on the SpamAssassin project. >> >> As we build up towards our first ASF release, we have a few >> contributions from non-committers in our bugzilla that are ready to

Re: contributions and CLAs

2004-05-06 Thread Sam Ruby
Justin Mason wrote: Hi incubator folks -- I'm one of the PMC and devs on the SpamAssassin project. As we build up towards our first ASF release, we have a few contributions from non-committers in our bugzilla that are ready to be applied, once we know that the submitter's CLA status allows that. W