AW: versatile container for software components seen as glue language?

hi noel thank you very much for your help... i hope it works... bye, marcus -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] Im Auftrag von Noel J. Bergman Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2004 00:43 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: vers

RE: [VOTE] Granting committer status to log4net developers

Ceki Gülcü wrote: > It would helpful if the purpose of the Incubator was clarified. If > it is an inspection tool, then it should not be disguised as a > service. Nutshell: the purpose of the Incubator is to help bring projects into the ASF, while ensuring that the proper procedures are followed

RE: Undermining the Incubator

Andrew C. Oliver wrote: All legal matters are for the Board and the Foundation's attorneys to address. Regarding audits ... There is a presumption of innocence in our legal system. I do not believe that due diligence requires an a priori presumption of fraud, and a investigation to "prove" its

RE: versatile container for software components seen as glue language?

Marcus, If this is a relatively small set of code performing XML directed assembly, it might be worth presenting it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for inclusion within the sandbox. The code does sound useful, and there may be enough folks interested in it (plus the two current developers you mentioned to m

versatile container for software components seen as glue language?

hi folks, as the different apache container approaches seem to be quite different, maybe it is a good idea to promote my project as an embeddable XML-based glue language - in my opinion it could also be seen as that. please consult for that this paper:

Re: [VOTE] Granting committer status to log4net developers

At 03:02 PM 1/12/2004 -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Ceki Gülcü wrote: > > Once the legal aspects are resolved, why adopt such a radical > position? Is it warranted? the resolution of the legal aspects is done by the incubator. why don't restaurants perform their own health inspections? it'

Re: Undermining the Incubator

> From: Rich Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:24:49 -0500 (EST) > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Undermining the Incubator > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:

[REPORTS DUE] Status reports of Incubating Projects

The Incubator project board report is due in a bit more than a week, as the board meeting should take place on Wed, 21 Jan 2004, 10am Pacific [1]. Thus all Mentors should ensure that every Incubating Project sends in their project report during this week, so that we have time to review it and s

RE: JIRA is live

Noel, Please add me as a jira admin. thanks, dims --- "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anou, > > In the two cases of jUDDI and Depot you mentioned, I checked the STATUS file > and saw that they are waiting on Jira, so I went ahead and created them. > For future reference, such req

Re: Committership in specified duration

On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 04:10, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: > Hello folks, > > > This is what i have been thinking about. For long. > > "Committership in specified duration". > > For example, "Log4XXX" (New Project) needs some > committers in order to improve the quality of the > codebases rapidly and