Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Forgot something:
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
* Check of project name for trademark issues
How do I do that? In particular, how do I record that I have
checked and found no issues?
*When* do I check? At the time the project wishes to exit incubation
status? Or as soo
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple of questions concerning
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ExitingIncubator
Some of them have already been asked (with no reply), some haven't.
* No non ASL or ASL compatbile dependencies in the code base
In the case of JaxMe, there are sever
Forgot something:
Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
* Check of project name for trademark issues
How do I do that? In particular, how do I record that I have
checked and found no issues?
*When* do I check? At the time the project wishes to exit incubation
status? Or as soon as possible, in order to a
Hi,
I have a couple of questions concerning
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ExitingIncubator
Some of them have already been asked (with no reply), some haven't.
* No non ASL or ASL compatbile dependencies in the code base
In the case of JaxMe, there are several unit tests, which
de
Vic Cekvenich wrote:
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > ... I have no idea what "one long e-mail" you mean, or what
> > "main issue" you think you have raised.
>
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.org&msgNo=2592
Ah. I had asked in case there was some germaine "main issue" that I had
Nicola Ken,
+1 on forming a PPMC for each project.
I feel that we should let the PPMC concept evolve organically, and impose
order only if we see it becoming disordered. The key issues are addressed
just by forming the PPMC: direct oversight and community participation.
A PMC policy to be deter
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
... I have no idea what
"one long e-mail" you mean, or what "main issue" you think you have raised.
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=2592
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
Vic Cekvenich wrote:
> I think you guys are talking around the "main issue" here, the
> one long e-mail I sent. Just address the "main issue" direct
> and once; make it public and the rest is easy.
Here are all of the e-mails you've ever posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://nagoya.apache.org/ey
I think you guys are talking around the "main issue" here, the one long
e-mail I sent.
Just address the "main issue" direct and once; make it public and the
rest is easy.
.V
ps: I think that the legal entity accountable for incubator.apache.org,
as per DNS registar is ASF. It may not be a rele
Given that there are still points to be discussed on the thread
'[VOTE] New Incubator rules and scope definition (long)', I am dividing
that vote by proposing the PPMC part that AFAIK has not yet recieved nays.
Below is the new PPMC proposal, edited to make it as short as possible.
My vote: +1
Leo Simons wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Hence I ask to vote
It's a big thing to vote on all at once.
Ok, got the message. In fact there are serious enough points to decide
to split the vote.
I still have
question marks with some points. What I'm looking
for is some signal that we are moving
Greg Stein wrote:
...
Just read the first part of the Board resolution which established the
Incubator:
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests
of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to
establish a Project Management Committee charged
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Leo Simons wrote:
> It's a big thing to vote on all at once. I still have
> question marks with some points. What I'm looking
> for is some signal that we are moving in a direction
> where the TLPs will actually *want* to follow
> incubation procedure (which would be a good si
13 matches
Mail list logo
