> Finally I have finished the new draft for a project incubation status
> page that should be more workable.
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NewProjectStatusTemplate
Minor nit: there actually is a Wonka project, so let's not use the name.
:-)
Items in tables that need to be checked off should
> > Migration is not built into Jira. The XML export is for backup, not
> > migration. I hacked a migration of the database, but we ran into
> > some problems. Jeff, who works for Atlassian, asked if he could
> > take over the migration so that they could debug it. So we're waiting
> > while Je
> > At some point, hopefully not too far down the pike, the
> > Committer is voted into the PMC. Until that happens,
> > the Committer does not have a binding vote. Cannot
> > have a binding vote, because to have one outside of the
> > legal structure would expose the Committer.
> Can you explai
> > Infrastructure isn't standing in the way of Jira. Infrastructure wants
to
> > USE Jira.
> So why don't we start right now. I can setup a project on the codehaus
> box and it can get migrated with the rest of the stuff.
Ask on infrastructure, but I think that people are willing to wait. What
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Committers could be given commit access long before having project
member status, and would thus be able to commit but not vote. This
makes it possible to keep a high bar for membership of the project but
a lower bar for committing.
Is this possibl
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 21:34, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > I'm just trying to draw a constrast between the way things used to be
> > done here, how Bob and I do things at Codehaus and the atmosphere that
> > is now here where doing anything seems to be a long drawn out, protacted
> > flurry of tome-li
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 21:34, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
> > Leo Simons wrote:
> > > I guess most of the same applies to Jira. We were waiting for a week or
> > > two for Noel and Serge to get things in place, now we're waiting for a
> > > week or two more for Jeff to finish somet
> I'm just trying to draw a constrast between the way things used to be
> done here, how Bob and I do things at Codehaus and the atmosphere that
> is now here where doing anything seems to be a long drawn out, protacted
> flurry of tome-like essays between committees.
Leo and Jason were given apsi
Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Leo Simons wrote:
> > I guess most of the same applies to Jira. We were waiting for a week or
> > two for Noel and Serge to get things in place, now we're waiting for a
> > week or two more for Jeff to finish something I can't remember. IMV,
> > it has got little to do with c
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Committers could be given commit access long before having project
> member status, and would thus be able to commit but not vote. This
> makes it possible to keep a high bar for membership of the project but
> a lower bar for committing.
>
> Is this possible/wanted?
A
B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Since AltRMI and FTPServer are in the "old" URL, what about moving them
> Fine with me, just toss rewrite rules into httpd.conf so folks going to
> the old URLs don't get the dreaded 404.
I was going to setup .htaccess
Guys,
I there are no objections I would like to forward mail from the sf.net
ldapd project to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. This is obviously
a short term thing until the community has switched over completely to
the Apache infrastructure.
Alex
--
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 15:06, Leo Simons wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 11:32, Leo Simons wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Jason volunteered, I volunteered, we were given access easily enough,
> >>proposals were accepted easily enough, and then it just took weeks for
> >>us to get thi
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 11:32, Leo Simons wrote:
Jason volunteered, I volunteered, we were given access easily enough,
proposals were accepted easily enough, and then it just took weeks for
us to get things in shape. That's got little to do with process or
committees, but mor
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 11:32, Leo Simons wrote:
> Jason van Zyl wrote:
>
> >I only say at the sheer frustration of watching it take an eon to get a
> >Wiki setup and JIRA.
> >
> maybe that's because you're watching :D
>
> seriously...some food for thought perhaps...
>
> the wiki is the first bit
Jason van Zyl wrote:
I only say at the sheer frustration of watching it take an eon to get a
Wiki setup and JIRA.
maybe that's because you're watching :D
seriously...some food for thought perhaps...
the wiki is the first bit of ASF infrastructure I'm getting more than
passively involved in.
Jaso
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 03:35, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > I only say at the sheer frustration of watching it take an eon to get a
> > Wiki setup and JIRA.
>
> On top of all the work that Jason Dillon did, Leo Simon worked all night
> tonight on code changes to MoinMoin. It appears he's finished.
Finally I have finished the new draft for a project incubation status
page that should be more workable.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NewProjectStatusTemplate
Comments, suggestions, blah blah blah welcome.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant,
Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Since AltRMI and FTPServer are in the "old" URL, what about moving them
> like this? No need to rush, it can be easily done in the next site update.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/altrmi
>|
>v
>
Since AltRMI and FTPServer are in the "old" URL, what about moving them
like this? No need to rush, it can be easily done in the next site update.
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/altrmi
|
v
http://incubator.apache.org/altrmi
http://incubator.apache.org/pro
What wiki's need to be created? I can create, but right now do not
have time to migrate data from the usemod wiki.
If ya just want a vanilla wiki though, that is simple.
--jason
On Nov 25, 2003, at 12:35 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I only say at the sheer frustration of watching it take an eon
> I only say at the sheer frustration of watching it take an eon to get a
> Wiki setup and JIRA.
On top of all the work that Jason Dillon did, Leo Simon worked all night
tonight on code changes to MoinMoin. It appears he's finished. The
Geronino and General Wikis need updating (the code), but th
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Then I'd call it Ruper for now, which is the name of the initially
> proposed codebase, where Ruper = resource updater.
Or in honor of the best competitor on Survivor, ever: Rupert.
Brian
23 matches
Mail list logo
