Re: incubator website is hosed

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Leo Simons wrote: > Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > > Personally, I've had my fill of this kind of crap being left on > > our public infrastructure. I shouldn't have to wait days to update > > a trivial website. > > Indeed. I think by now its been pointed out several times exactly

Re: incubator website is hosed

On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 09:54 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: ... No - there was a real site at one point, and even done in forrest. It wasn't the incubator boilerplate. I know because I did it (along with some others) when geronimo started. It's really important r

Re: incubator website is hosed

Perfect! Thanks!! On Nov 11, 2003, at 10:28 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Could whoever has some knowledge of how the website is setup and constructed simply make whatever changes are required to "post" the Letter with a short note that we are actively reviewing not only the

Re: incubator website is hosed

Jim Jagielski wrote: Could whoever has some knowledge of how the website is setup and constructed simply make whatever changes are required to "post" the Letter with a short note that we are actively reviewing not only the specific claims but also the code base in general... Doing it. I will write

RE: incubator website is hosed

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: ... > No - there was a real site at one point, and even done in forrest. It > wasn't the incubator boilerplate. I know because I did it (along with > some others) when geronimo started. > > It's really important right now that we have a site to deal with the > JBoss asse

Re: incubator website is hosed

Could whoever has some knowledge of how the website is setup and constructed simply make whatever changes are required to "post" the Letter with a short note that we are actively reviewing not only the specific claims but also the code base in general...

Re: incubator website is hosed

On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 09:12 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: ... No - there was a real site at one point, and even done in forrest. It wasn't the incubator boilerplate. I know because I did it (along with some others) when geronimo started. It's really import

Re: incubator website is hosed

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: ... No - there was a real site at one point, and even done in forrest. It wasn't the incubator boilerplate. I know because I did it (along with some others) when geronimo started. It's really important right now that we have a site to deal with the JBoss assertion th

Re: cvs commit: incubator/site/projects/geronimo index.xml

What happened to the stuff that we did have? On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 06:15 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fielding2003/11/10 18:22:27 Modified:site/projects index.xml site/projects/geronimo index.xml Log: projects need a directory to

Re: incubator website is hosed

On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 05:35 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Roy T. Fielding wrote: The /www/incubator.apache.org/ directory tree on minotaur contains both a checked-out incubator-site *and* the generated output of a forrestbot via incubator. It obviously can't

Re: [Possible Incubation] Apache Repo

On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 03:21 AM, Stephen McConnell wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I can't. Can you explain? Geir: I could - but to be honest I'm flat out on some really important stuff that I have to close. Can we come back to this in maybe at the end of this week? I'm sorr

Re: incubator website is hosed

On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 02:51 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote: Personally, I've had my fill of this kind of crap being left on our public infrastructure. I shouldn't have to wait days to update a trivial website. If someone doesn't beat me to it,

Re: cvs commit: incubator/site/projects/geronimo index.xml

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fielding2003/11/10 18:22:27 Modified:site/projects index.xml site/projects/geronimo index.xml Log: projects need a directory to place stuff on their website I have explicitly moved the status files in the projects/ dir so that they don't inte

Re: incubator website is hosed

Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Roy T. Fielding wrote: The /www/incubator.apache.org/ directory tree on minotaur contains both a checked-out incubator-site *and* the generated output of a forrestbot via incubator. It obviously can't be both. ... /geronimo (old CVS dirs) Wait a sec, you mean that G

Re: incubator website is hosed

Henri Yandell wrote: On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote: Personally, I've had my fill of this kind of crap being left on our public infrastructure. I shouldn't have to wait days to update a trivial website. If someone doesn't beat me to it, I am going to replace it with Anakia tomorro

Re: incubator website is hosed

Roy T. Fielding wrote: The /www/incubator.apache.org/ directory tree on minotaur contains both a checked-out incubator-site *and* the generated output of a forrestbot via incubator. It obviously can't be both. or can it be? IIRC, forrestbot just generates the website, then commits changes to th

Re: incubator website is hosed

Roy T. Fielding wrote: The /www/incubator.apache.org/ directory tree on minotaur contains both a checked-out incubator-site *and* the generated output of a forrestbot via incubator. It obviously can't be both. I look at the site and it's all consistent and the pages are uptodate with the incubato

Re: [Possible Incubation] Apache Repo

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Sunday, November 9, 2003, at 02:50 AM, Stephen McConnell wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 01:08, Stephen McConnell wrote: Jason van Zyl wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 00:35, Stephen McConnell wrote: Jason: I must confess that I am intrigued

Re: incubator website is hosed

--On Tuesday, November 11, 2003 2:51 AM -0500 Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm using it in a bunch of places, but still have no real clue where the real anakia lives etc. -- justin -

Re: incubator website is hosed

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Personally, I've had my fill of this kind of crap being left on > our public infrastructure. I shouldn't have to wait days to update > a trivial website. If someone doesn't beat me to it, I am going to > replace it with Anakia tomorrow. Slightly o