On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 23:27:13 +0900
Tetsuya Kitahata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <>
>
>
>
> The XXX pmc has agreed to accept the YYY project for incubation.
> To aid in the process,
> Please create these below:
>
>
Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Thursday, July 24, 2003, at 07:23 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>
> > IMHO it depends on what the incubator PMC does. If they *do* create
> > the
> > lists and the such then maybe they should set policy (meaning telling
> > other
> > people what
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 15:17:45 +0200
Erik Abele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25/07/2003, at 02:40, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:14:04 +0200 "Sander Striker"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm 0 on both suggestions. Go with this one for now*. And lets not
> >> delay k
> From: Erik Abele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 3:18 PM
[...]
> Okay, I'm fine with this for now, but without an explicitly stated
> policy this discussion will come up every time a project arrives at the
> incubator. We definitely need a policy here, IMHO!
I agree.
On 25/07/2003, at 02:05, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
On 7/25/03 7:46 AM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's simple:
The Incubator PMC is responsible for the project. All others (can)
help.
No this is difference than in the past. Remember the Incubator is
here to
help and its OUR
On 25/07/2003, at 02:40, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:14:04 +0200 "Sander Striker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm 0 on both suggestions. Go with this one for now*. And lets not
delay kicking off a project for this for too long.
applause!!
Okay, I'm fine with this for now, but w
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:14:04 +0200
"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [ ] project-subproject CVS
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I'm 0 on both suggestions. Go with this one for now*. And lets not
> delay kicking off a project for
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:48 PM
> Since IMHO this has been already discussed enough and different POVs
> remain, I ask for a vote on the following.
>
> What should we use as a policy in creating resources for incubating
> projects?
>
Andrew C. Oliver wrote, On 25/07/2003 14.05:
On 7/25/03 7:46 AM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's simple:
The Incubator PMC is responsible for the project. All others (can) help.
No this is difference than in the past. Remember the Incubator is here to
help and its OUR respo
On 7/25/03 7:46 AM, "Nicola Ken Barozzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's simple:
>
> The Incubator PMC is responsible for the project. All others (can) help.
>
No this is difference than in the past. Remember the Incubator is here to
help and its OUR responsibility to incubate? Its sounding
Berin Lautenbach wrote, On 25/07/2003 9.07:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
IMHO it depends on what the incubator PMC does. If they *do* create the
lists and the such then maybe they should set policy (meaning telling
other
people what do do == policy). If they rely on the XML project and the
XMLBeans
On 24 Jul 2003 07:17:38 +0200
"Andreas Kuckartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So incubator folks, what is the correct policy here?
>
> Lenya is also incubated @cocoon.apache.org and not @incubator.apache.org
>
> I do not see much sense in moving mailing lists arround. Please avoid
> such need
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
IMHO it depends on what the incubator PMC does. If they *do* create the
lists and the such then maybe they should set policy (meaning telling other
people what do do == policy). If they rely on the XML project and the
XMLBeans folks to do things then they should allow the
13 matches
Mail list logo
