another action item...
- Forwarded message from Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: XML FOP: Licensing issues with hyphenation pattern files
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 08:54
Aaron Bannert wrote, On 17/03/2003 8.25:
On Saturday, March 15, 2003, at 02:50 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Anyway, I'm curious: since I develop only java and I don't use other
languages since the universtity (so take this question with the same
grain of salt ;-) , what would have you thought
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
The Cocoon project has voted to accept the Lenya proposal, thus Lenya
is officially in the Incubator :-)
First of all, we need to get the legal stuff straight.
1) License grant
We need to recieve papers that transfer rights to the ASF.
It is necessary to transfer rig
Michael Wechner wrote, On 19/03/2003 0.24:
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
...
So IMHO we should push these docs to the site by hand and not use the
site CVS for it.
IMHO what you need is a "CMS" ;-)
Nicola, please apologize my remark, but I just couldn't help it.
;-P
btw, the Lenya docs are now bas
The Cocoon project has voted to accept the Lenya proposal, thus Lenya is
officially in the Incubator :-)
First of all, we need to get the legal stuff straight.
1) License grant
We need to recieve papers that transfer rights to the ASF.
It is necessary to transfer rights for the package, the co
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote, On 18/03/2003 20.56:
if the documentation is easily generated from a cvs checkout
using tools any user will have available, not putting the
generated files in cvs *might* be an option. if building
the docco requires either specialised tools
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote, On 18/03/2003 20.56:
if the documentation is easily generated from a cvs checkout
using tools any user will have available, not putting the
generated files in cvs *might* be an option. if building
the docco requires either specialised tools or knowledge,
the docco sho
if the documentation is easily generated from a cvs checkout
using tools any user will have available, not putting the
generated files in cvs *might* be an option. if building
the docco requires either specialised tools or knowledge,
the docco should be under cms control. mho after doing
this shi
Aaron Bannert wrote, On 17/03/2003 8.28:
Sorry to be a nag, but are these all just autogenerated from
javadoc?
Yes.
Surely javadoc output need not be in CVS.
Why? This CVS is of the site, and many users ask for the javadocs to be
online, so...
This is one of the reasons why having the generat
Scott Cantor wrote, On 16/03/2003 2.20:
...
Not having /usr/lib, library versioning, etc. is among the most obnoxious things about Java, IMHO.
*sigh*
But we're getting there :-D
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussion
10 matches
Mail list logo
