Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Andrew,
Since Web Services = Legal Mine field...Getting the license for Apache will ensure that Apache as
a Legal Entity will be protected and that the coding can go on for now. There are 2 JSR's in the
jcp and WS-Security spec in OASIS that will need this as well.
Am no
I think there was something (maybe on slashdot) recently about
"letters of intent". The conclusion seemed to be that they are pretty
much meaningless and unenforceable.
I think one also can keep this company's dubious history in mind.
-Andy
Conor
Sam Ruby wrote:
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Isn't that a no no?
The board is discussing this.
What scares the crap out of me is the weasel words. "intent to offer
royalty free...".
As a rule, lawyers are very careful in what they say and do not say. I
can only presume that the word "intent"
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Andrew,
Since Web Services = Legal Mine field...Getting the license for Apache will ensure that Apache as
a Legal Entity will be protected and that the coding can go on for now. There are 2 JSR's in the
jcp and WS-Security spec in OASIS that will need this as well.
Am n
> What scares the crap out of me is the weasel words. "intent to offer
> royalty free...".
>
> As a rule, lawyers are very careful in what they say and do
> not say. I can only presume that the word "intent" was carefully chosen.
We've assumed the word is there simply because they have not se
Andrew,
Since Web Services = Legal Mine field...Getting the license for Apache will ensure
that Apache as
a Legal Entity will be protected and that the coding can go on for now. There are 2
JSR's in the
jcp and WS-Security spec in OASIS that will need this as well.
Am not sure there anything e
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Isn't that a no no?
The board is discussing this.
What scares the crap out of me is the weasel words. "intent to offer
royalty free...".
As a rule, lawyers are very careful in what they say and do not say. I
can only presume that the word "intent" was carefully chos
Isn't that a no no?
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Andrew,
IANAL...But I think you are right.
Thanks,
dims
--- "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Clarify this for me. I might contribute to this OpenSAML, which I'm
free to do as a member of Apache who would hence have license. Howeve
> Clarify this for me. I might contribute to this OpenSAML, which I'm
> free to do as a member of Apache who would hence have license. However
> if I take this back to my company (outside of Apache) I must then seek
> another license which by intent (though not by agreement) would again be
>
Andrew,
IANAL...But I think you are right.
Thanks,
dims
--- "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Clarify this for me. I might contribute to this OpenSAML, which I'm
> free to do as a member of Apache who would hence have license. However
> if I take this back to my company (outsid
Clarify this for me. I might contribute to this OpenSAML, which I'm
free to do as a member of Apache who would hence have license. However
if I take this back to my company (outside of Apache) I must then seek
another license which by intent (though not by agreement) would again be
Royalty fr
Nicola, Folks,
Here's the latest from RSA -
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/security-services/200302/msg00036.html
Thanks,
dims
--- Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote, On 17/02/2003 16.23:
> > Incubator Folks,
> >
> > We (PMC@WS) had a VOTE for acc
> Below is what seems the last mail on this subject on this
> list. Reading that, I tend to think that the incubator, at
> this point, is capable of taking a formal position on this matter, and we
> should probably ask the board.
RSA posted a new statement on the SSTC web site and confirmed the
Davanum Srinivas wrote, On 17/02/2003 16.23:
Incubator Folks,
We (PMC@WS) had a VOTE for accepting OpenSAML as part of Web Services project. Here are the
results.
+1 from 12 members. Zero -1 or -0 or +0 votes.
Excellent.
What should we do next. Please advise.
The only thing that I'd want
Hi there
Before I open a SourceForge project I wanted to ask if there might be
interest in a barcode library/framework here at Apache. I started to
develop the library two years ago and it has already seen real-life use
in two projects with my last employer. I'm in the process of doing a
major ref
Dear Incubator List
Here's our proposal for _Lenya_ (plz see below), a Content Management
System based on Cocoon. The proposal can also be viewed as HTML at:
http://www.wyona.org/lenya.html
Relevant Links are also:
http://www.wyona.org/docs/xdocs/architecture.html
http://www.wyona.org/roadmap
16 matches
Mail list logo
