Henneke, Amanda M
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 1:14 PM
To: Even Rouault
Cc: steve.tout...@inspq.qc.ca; gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org;
gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [gdal-dev] Translating between UTM and Geographic
Even-
Thanks!
I do get something different from you: -117
s e-mail.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Even Rouault [mailto:even.roua...@mines-paris.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 1:05 PM
> To: Henneke, Amanda M
> Cc: steve.tout...@inspq.qc.ca; gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org; gdal-dev-
> boun...@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE: [gda
manda M
Cc: steve.tout...@inspq.qc.ca; gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org;
gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [gdal-dev] Translating between UTM and Geographic
Amanda,
You didn't specify why you believe that the coordinates you get are not right.
Are you validating against another reference t
Amanda,
You didn't specify why you believe that the coordinates you get are not right.
Are you validating against another reference tool ? Could you give an example of
input, the output you get and the output you expect.
Here's what I've tried with the gdaltransform utility (in latest FWTools 2.4
eve.tout...@inspq.qc.ca [mailto:steve.tout...@inspq.qc.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:41 PM
To: Henneke, Amanda M
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org; gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [gdal-dev] Translating between UTM and Geographic
What is the wkt you are using for zone 12 nad83
[mailto:steve.tout...@inspq.qc.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:41 PM
To: Henneke, Amanda M
Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org; gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [gdal-dev] Translating between UTM and Geographic
What is the wkt you are using for zone 12 nad83?
"Henneke, A
What is the wkt you are using for zone 12 nad83?
"Henneke, Amanda M" @lists.osgeo.org
Envoyé par : gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
23/09/2009 01:39 PM
A
"gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org"
cc
Objet
RE: [gdal-dev] Translating between UTM and Geographic
Here is some m
ngle thing in Nature, he finds it attached to the rest of
the world. -John Muir
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
-Original Message-
From: gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Henneke, Amanda M
Sent: Wednes
Miller [mailto:craig.mil...@spatialminds.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 11:51 AM
To: Henneke, Amanda M
Subject: RE: [gdal-dev] Translating between UTM and Geographic
Geographic is a projection, not a datum. What Datum is the data in the
"Geographic Projection" in? E.g. you
The problem might not be in your code but in the WKT projection
information (sSpRefParams).
Steve Toutant, M. Sc.
Analyste en géomatique
Secteur environnement
Direction des risques biologiques, environnementaux et occupationnels
Institut national de santé publique du Québec
945, avenue Wolfe
Qué
9 01:04 PM
A
"steve.tout...@inspq.qc.ca"
cc
Objet
RE: RE [gdal-dev] Translating between UTM and Geographic
What do you mean by "good parameters" is there something I need to add to
the code I included?
Amanda M. Henneke
IG/DB Tools - TSS Capability Center
Boeing - St. L
hi,
slight shift in the points (to the east) and an extremely slight shift up
(to the north).
That seems to be a datum error. Make sure you set the good parameters for
datum when using nad83 or nad27.
Steve
"Henneke, Amanda M" @lists.osgeo.org
Envoyé par : gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
