Hello,
2009/7/14 Jorge Arévalo :
> Ok, here are the Corner coordinates of the utm.tif file (gdalinfo output):
>
> Corner Coordinates:
> Upper Left ( 440720.000, 3751320.000) (117d38'28.21"W, 33d54'8.47"N)
> Lower Left ( 440720.000, 3720600.000) (117d38'20.79"W, 33d37'31.04"N)
> Upper Right (
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Jorge Arévalo wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>
> I'd suggest to test datasets based on EPSG 4326 first.
> After these work for you, then switch to projected ones.
Jorge Arévalo wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I'd suggest to test datasets based on EPSG 4326 first.
After these work for you, then switch to projected ones.
Do you know where can I find geotiff images based on EPSG:4326?
Jorge,
My favorite images for ini
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>>> I'd suggest to test datasets based on EPSG 4326 first.
>>> After these work for you, then switch to projected ones.
>>
>> Do you know where can I find geotiff images based on EPSG:4326?
>
> Jorge,
>
> My favorite images for initial
Jorge Arévalo wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Pierre Racine wrote:
Jorge,
4267 should be the right CS (http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4267/).
Actually, it isn't.
What gdalinfo reports for the file cea.tif is a projected CS,
this one to be precise:
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Pierre Racine wrote:
>> Jorge,
>>
>> 4267 should be the right CS (http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4267/).
>
> Actually, it isn't.
> What gdalinfo reports for the file cea.tif is a projected CS,
> this one to be precise:
>
> http
