Thanks for the info.
I'll look into GeoPackage!
Jan
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Even Rouault
wrote:
> Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 22:02:34, Jan Heckman a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Extending shapefile capabilities: The one reason which might persuade
> > anyone is the still abundant use of shapef
Le mercredi 30 avril 2014 22:02:34, Jan Heckman a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Extending shapefile capabilities: The one reason which might persuade
> anyone is the still abundant use of shapefiles for dataexchange.
> Shapefile does seem to play a vital role there. I don't know of anything
> equally 'tradeab
Hi,
Extending shapefile capabilities: The one reason which might persuade
anyone is the still abundant use of shapefiles for dataexchange.
Shapefile does seem to play a vital role there. I don't know of anything
equally 'tradeable'.
However, an extension would also endanger the
interoperability/da
Le mardi 29 avril 2014 19:46:46, Jan Heckman a écrit :
> Hi,
> It appears I have to do some homework on ogr's shapefile functions as it
> stands now.
>
> 8GB: If interoperability is more of a priority than capacity, that's a
> valid consideration. I've not really needed anything > 4GB so far.
I'm
Jan Heckman gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Hi,It appears I have to do some homework on ogr's shapefile functions as
it stands now.
>
> 8GB: If interoperability is more of a priority than capacity, that's a
valid consideration. I've not really needed anything > 4GB so far.
>
> Delete:
> By delete I
Hello Jan,
On a related note: for the Fedora package which I maintain, I've also
added a number of out of tree patches: mainly backporting the
improvements from the version bundled in gdal as well as replacing the
buildsystem with an autotools one, to allow easy mingw
cross-compilation. My pa
Hi,
It appears I have to do some homework on ogr's shapefile functions as it
stands now.
8GB: If interoperability is more of a priority than capacity, that's a
valid consideration. I've not really needed anything > 4GB so far.
Delete:
By delete I mean leaving the information in the file but (shap
Le lundi 28 avril 2014 23:39:34, Jan Heckman a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I've used and maintained an offshoot shapefile library (thanks, Frank), and
> added bits of functionality when needed. There are two that I think might
> be of wider interest.
>
> 1) possibility to have shapefiles up to 8 GB (instea
Hi,
I've used and maintained an offshoot shapefile library (thanks, Frank), and
added bits of functionality when needed. There are two that I think might
be of wider interest.
1) possibility to have shapefiles up to 8 GB (instead of 4 GB in ogr or 2
GB elsewhere);
2) implementing deletes.
ad 1) t
