> > -
> > --
> >
> > Note on darwin we typically use the system libz which appears to be
> > derivation of 1.2.5.
>
> I can reproduce this output from pngfix on a Fedora 15 box as follows...
>
> % tar -zxvf libpng-1.6.6.tar
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:46:12PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:31:05PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:24:51PM +0100, Even Rouault wrote:
> > > Le vendredi 08 novembre 2013 18:50:45, Jack Howarth a écrit :
> > > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:12:0
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:31:05PM -0500, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:24:51PM +0100, Even Rouault wrote:
> > Le vendredi 08 novembre 2013 18:50:45, Jack Howarth a écrit :
> > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:12:05AM -0800, Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> > > > Jack,
> > > >
> > > > Is there
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 08:24:51PM +0100, Even Rouault wrote:
> Le vendredi 08 novembre 2013 18:50:45, Jack Howarth a écrit :
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:12:05AM -0800, Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> > > Jack,
> > >
> > > Is there an explanation someplace with more detail as to what is wrong
> > > those
Le vendredi 08 novembre 2013 18:50:45, Jack Howarth a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:12:05AM -0800, Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> > Jack,
> >
> > Is there an explanation someplace with more detail as to what is wrong
> > those png's, why older versions of libpng are okay with it and why
> > libpng h
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:12:05AM -0800, Kurt Schwehr wrote:
> Jack,
>
> Is there an explanation someplace with more detail as to what is wrong those
> png's, why older versions of libpng are okay with it and why libpng has
> changed its behavior?
>
> Thanks,
> -kurt
Kurt,
The following li
Jack,
Is there an explanation someplace with more detail as to what is wrong those
png's, why older versions of libpng are okay with it and why libpng has changed
its behavior?
Thanks,
-kurt
On Nov 8, 2013, at 8:02 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:31:08AM -0500, Jack Ho
