Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-12 Thread Viji V Nair
Hi On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > Ciao Even, > I am neither trying to cut it short nor I was anyhow offended by your > response but you are email > is drawing is essence from a few  misunderstandings which I would like > to clarify before this thread takes more time

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-12 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Even, I am neither trying to cut it short nor I was anyhow offended by your response but you are email is drawing is essence from a few misunderstandings which I would like to clarify before this thread takes more time/space: -1- Viji is trying to package the development version of imageio-e

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-12 Thread Ivan Lucena
Even, > ---Original Message--- > From: Even Rouault > To: Ivan Lucena > Cc: Simone Giannecchini , > gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org, Viji V Nair > Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension > Sent: Dec 10 '10 18:41 > > Le vendredi 10 décembre 20

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Even Rouault
Le vendredi 10 décembre 2010 15:22:25, Ivan Lucena a écrit : > Ciao Simone, Salut Even, > > Let's see this one here for example: > > Method names begin with Capital letters. The Java standard is > > that methods always begin with lowercase letters; classes begin > > with U

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Even Rouault
Le vendredi 10 décembre 2010 10:27:49, Simone Giannecchini a écrit : > Ciao Even, > I have asked daniele to make those changes (which have not been reviewed > yet) in order to move away from the explicit usage of Vector and HashTable > in method signatures in favour of using the respective interfac

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Viji V Nair
Hi On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Simone Giannecchini wrote: > Ciao Even, > I have asked daniele to make those changes (which have not been reviewed yet) > in order to move away from the explicit usage of Vector and HashTable in > method > signatures in favour of using the respective interface

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Simone Giannecchini
a year or two) and the new one would complain with Java > standards and updated to whatever the language have evolved so far. > > IMHO. > > Regards, > > Ivan > > >>  ---Original Message--- >>  From: Simone Giannecchini >>  To: Even Rouault >>  Cc

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Ivan Lucena
> ---Original Message--- > From: Simone Giannecchini > To: Even Rouault > Cc: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org, Viji V Nair > Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension > Sent: Dec 10 '10 04:27 > > Ciao Even, > I have asked daniele to make those changes (w

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-10 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Even, I have asked daniele to make those changes (which have not been reviewed yet) in order to move away from the explicit usage of Vector and HashTable in method signatures in favour of using the respective interfaces (List and Map). Daniele can add more as needed... As you mentioned this c

Re: [gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-09 Thread Even Rouault
Hi Viji, I maintain the GDAL Java bindings, but the image-io GDAL plugin is another project whose maintener is Daniele I think. He'll correct me if I'm wrong, but I saw his name on http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ImageIO-EXT+GDAL ;-) . I've CC'ed him so he has a chance to comment and

[gdal-dev] image-io extension

2010-12-09 Thread Viji V Nair
Hi, I am one of the GDAL co-maintainer for Fedora, I would like to have the image-io extension support, currently it been supported through the following patch from image-io. But I dont think this is a good idea as the modifications are bit heavy. https://imageio-ext.dev.java.net/svn/imageio-ext/