Hi Etienne,
I have uploaded an other version that works without matplotlib, although I
prefer the other, which is cleaner. But the new one is a better option if
using matplotlib is a problem.
Anyway, changing gdal_contour is much more work. Creating polygons instead
of lines using the correct way
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Carlo A. Bertelli (Charta s.r.l.) <
berte...@charta.acme.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot, Roger, it worked like a charm, just fiddling a little with
> parameters and than run it in python.
> It's really magic, I struggled with this question for two days before
> writing
Thanks a lot, Roger, it worked like a charm, just fiddling a little with
parameters and than run it in python.
It's really magic, I struggled with this question for two days before
writing to the list.
I think that instead of making another script you could add it as an option
to gdal_contour.py an
Hi, I was just working on that.
I think that you need a script like gdal_contour, but creatig polygons
instead of lines. The algorithm used is Marching Squares.
You can see the code, without explanation, here:
https://github.com/rveciana/geoexamples/tree/master/python/raster_isobands
In some weeks
Hello,
gdaldem makes a very good work and gdal_polygonize.py too, but the
combination is not so effective. Is there a way to obtain smooth polygons
representing shaded areas as it's possible with Arc? When using a dem, you
get polygons for pixels. Yes you can dissolve them, but you still have
jagge
