the current NetCDF driver and
its CF-1 convention could be improved.
Hendy
- Original Message -
From: "James Hiebert"
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Sent: Friday, 26 August, 2011 3:50:09 AM
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] discussion on improvements to the NetCDF driver and
CF-1
FWIW my organization is a heavy user of both GDAL and geographic netcdfs
(usually disparately since GDAL can't always handle the CF-1.x compliant files
that we have/use/create). So if you're assessing need in the community, I'll
add a +1. Not sure how much I can help; I'm not an expert in eith
Etienne,
I am all for the improvements. I am a little short on time for the next 2-4
weeks, but I would like to spend some time on this. I think that the closer
we get to a CF-1.x compliant file the better. That also gives us a little
better specification to work towards. I hope to have some mo
Hi all,
I would like to start a discussion with those interested about fixing various
issues in the NetCDF driver.
As it stands, it is not fully CF-1.0 compliant, and produces geographical grids
that are not valid for other software.
Also, the infamous "up-side down" problem has been addressed f