Re: [gdal-dev] WMS Driver defaulting to version 1.1.1

2016-03-02 Thread Jukka Rahkonen
Passmore, James H. bgs.ac.uk> writes: > > I agree with all those that think that a request like > http://myservice/ows?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities&; should return the highest supported > version of WMS on that server (currently 1.3.0 but in the near? future 1.4.0 and then 2.0.0...). Th

Re: [gdal-dev] WMS Driver defaulting to version 1.1.1

2016-03-02 Thread Passmore, James H.
I agree with all those that think that a request like http://myservice/ows?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities&; should return the highest supported version of WMS on that server (currently 1.3.0 but in the near? future 1.4.0 and then 2.0.0...). This is the expected behaviour according the to

Re: [gdal-dev] WMS Driver defaulting to version 1.1.1

2016-03-02 Thread Damian Dixon
I would concur with Ian and Jeff. My experience of WMS servers is that those that say that they are 1.3.0 are miss-configured or are just not following the standard well enough. Not all of the WMS 1.3.0 servers are at fault but enough that it is safer and less time consuming to default to 1.1.0.

Re: [gdal-dev] WMS Driver defaulting to version 1.1.1

2016-03-02 Thread Timothy Astle
To be clear, I personally don't have a problem with 1.1.1. My concern is about version negotiation as a WMS client. I've seen users omit the version and then when something doesn't behave as expected, they manually (in a web browser) make a request as follows: http://www.example.com?request=

Re: [gdal-dev] WMS Driver defaulting to version 1.1.1

2016-03-02 Thread Michael Smith
, March 2, 2016 at 9:05 AM To: Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] WMS Driver defaulting to version 1.1.1 >Hi Tim, > >I can tell you just by use alone, the 1.1.1 standard is most prevalent. > In the MapServer world, it is 1.1.1 that dominates. I also find, >having been at this a long time now,

Re: [gdal-dev] WMS Driver defaulting to version 1.1.1

2016-03-02 Thread Jeff McKenna
Hi Tim, I can tell you just by use alone, the 1.1.1 standard is most prevalent. In the MapServer world, it is 1.1.1 that dominates. I also find, having been at this a long time now, that the 1.1.1 specification is most likely to be supported, if WMS is supported at all, by other mapping eng

Re: [gdal-dev] WMS Driver defaulting to version 1.1.1

2016-03-02 Thread Ian Turton
There are lots of reasons to stick with 1.1.0 and few reasons to move to 1.3 so I would guess anyone who knows they want 1.3 will want to specify it to be sure while naive users will be less suprised at getting a 1.0.0 version back if they haven't thought about it. Ian On 2 March 2016 at 13:58, T

[gdal-dev] WMS Driver defaulting to version 1.1.1

2016-03-02 Thread Timothy Astle
Does anyone know why the WMS Driver defaults to version 1.1.1 instead of 1.3.0 by default? Does anyone have any objections with this changing to 1.3.0? It seems like 1.3.0 would fall more into line with the specifications content negotiation. https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/trunk/gdal/frm