Konstantin,
My understanding of the current state of GDAL 1.6.0 regarding those 2 RFCs
is :
- RFC #5 has never been implemented, not even proposed to vote. The meaning of
the terms 'development', 'adopted', etc is given at the bottom of the RfcList
page
- RFC #23 has been implemented, at leas
Hi!
There are two RFCs regarding the Unicode issues:
RFC #5: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc5_unicode
RFC #23: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc23_ogr_unicode
RFC #23 seems to be adopted for GDAL 1.6. But to me it is not that clear,
which functions/me