Yes, I see half a pixel difference between GeoTIFF and GML georeferencing.
Luke
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Tester-with-ERDAS-needed-tp5079161p5079750.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
lpinner environment.gov.au> writes:
>
> I've tried both geographic and projected tiffs. The original tiffs were a mix
> of very small test data (8bit, single band, 100 cols x 100 rows) and fairly
> large Worldview-2 16bit pan and multispectral scenes.
>
> All of the output jp2s have only a sing
ry good at breaking software, but not this time : )
Luke
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Tester-with-ERDAS-needed-tp5079161p5079734.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
gdal-d
lpinner environment.gov.au> writes:
>
> I've tried to replicate with ERDAS Imagine 2013, but the resulting JP2s are
> georeferenced correctly in ArcMap and GDAL 1.10 (before r26485). This was
> with "Embed GeoTIFF" checked and "Embed GML" unchecked in the ERDAS Imagine
> export options dialog.
>
eoTIFF JP2Box is a bug in earlier versions of Imagine and
has since been fixed?
Luke
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gdal-dev-Tester-with-ERDAS-needed-tp5079161p5079416.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Hi,
It would be fine if someone with access to ERDAS Imagine could test if a
certain JPEG2000 georeferencing issue got corrected by
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/5249.
The description of the ticket is
"Under some circumstances, ERDAS Imagine can produce JPEG2000 with 2
embedded GeoTIFF JP2Box
