eo.org] On Behalf Of Jukka Rahkonen
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 10:37 AM
> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [gdal-dev] Slow writing into Spatialite with -skipfailures
>
> Hi,
>
> I had to write a million polygon shapefile into Spatialite with
> -skipfailures a
ay, April 04, 2012 10:37 AM
> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: [gdal-dev] Slow writing into Spatialite with -skipfailures
>
> Hi,
>
> I had to write a million polygon shapefile into Spatialite with
> -skipfailures and I noticed that it was very many times slower that
>
il 04, 2012 10:37 AM
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: [gdal-dev] Slow writing into Spatialite with -skipfailures
Hi,
I had to write a million polygon shapefile into Spatialite with
-skipfailures and I noticed that it was very many times slower that
without -skipfailures. Is there some logica
Le mercredi 04 avril 2012 19:16:34, Rahkonen Jukka a écrit :
> Even Rouault wrote:
> >Selon Jukka Rahkonen :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I had to write a million polygon shapefile into Spatialite with
> >> -skipfailures and I noticed that it was very many times slower that
> >> without -skipfailures. Is
>
Even Rouault wrote:
>Selon Jukka Rahkonen :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had to write a million polygon shapefile into Spatialite with -skipfailures
>> and I noticed that it was very many times slower that without -skipfailures.
>> Is
>> there some logical reason for that or could it be due to a bug or someth
Selon Jukka Rahkonen :
> Hi,
>
> I had to write a million polygon shapefile into Spatialite with -skipfailures
> and I noticed that it was very many times slower that without -skipfailures.
> Is
> there some logical reason for that or could it be due to a bug or something?
> Only thing that comes
Hi,
I had to write a million polygon shapefile into Spatialite with -skipfailures
and I noticed that it was very many times slower that without -skipfailures. Is
there some logical reason for that or could it be due to a bug or something?
Only thing that comes into my mind is that if the -gt param
