On 13 May 2015 at 09:30, Vankadara, Sunil
wrote:
> Hi Jukka,
>
Hi devs,
I did several test, and
>
> I could understand from your mail that the mediabox is nothing but the image
> size in terms of width and height and the user unit is nothing but each
> pixel size.
>
>
>
> Does it mean it is the
t: Re: [gdal-dev] Regarding DPI in Geospatial PDF
Vankadara, Sunil hexagongeospatial.com> writes:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I have created two PDF file with default DPI and 600 values using
gdal_translate application.
> Unfortunately I couldn't find any difference among thes
?
Regards
Sunil
-Original Message-
From: gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:gdal-dev-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Jukka Rahkonen
Sent: 11 May 2015 03:21:PM
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Regarding DPI in Geospatial PDF
Vankadara, Sunil hexagongeospatial.com
Jukka Rahkonen maanmittauslaitos.fi> writes:
> It could be that GDAL should not touch to the size of the MediaBox if it
> does not exceed 14400 in either dimension.
Sorry, this was at least unclear or nonsense. What I meant to say was that
perhaps GDAL should handle the MediaBox size and UserU
Vankadara, Sunil hexagongeospatial.com> writes:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> I have created two PDF file with default DPI and 600 values using
gdal_translate application.
> Unfortunately I couldn't find any difference among these two created files
like file size, pixel size etc.
>
> The input file details
Hi Team,
I have created two PDF file with default DPI and 600 values using
gdal_translate application.
Unfortunately I couldn't find any difference among these two created files like
file size, pixel size etc.
The input file details are
Input file type: Erdas . img file
Width of the image: 1193
