Hi,
I did not get an answer for my question bellow so I did some testing. I write
to help others that will find this post. (I am making a point to raster query
tool.) It’s much faster to load a cloud of point to a function and to loop a
query to each band than to load a single band to a funct
Thanks again Even,
Is there a way I can test for this data organization and warn the user? I know
very little about this aspect but I enjoy the learning curve.
As a follow up (if I may abuse!), I have one file with thousands points and
one raster with hundreds of bands, both huge.
I have bee
On mardi 12 mars 2019 01:56:34 CET Nicolas Cadieux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am writing a python script and I need to read certain pixels form a huge
> Hyperspectral images with over 200 band. If I use the method below from
> the tutorial, if I understand correctly, memory hits will only come from
>
Hi,
I am writing a python script and I need to read certain pixels form a huge
Hyperspectral images with over 200 band. If I use the method below from the
tutorial, if I understand correctly, memory hits will only come from what I
place in the buffer? In this case, only one line of pixels?