hi.
as far as i know GDAL is much robust & Quicker.
i have converted Tiff to Ascii using Gdal 1.6.2 & found the performance
excellent
Gdal converted in 3 minutes and ArcGIS took around 7 to 8 minutes for the
same task..
Trust you are using the latest Build of 1.7.2..
cheers
Bhasker
yeah,
i did the same task with ARCGIS it took only 2 minutes only but the output
of the two datasets(gdal,ARCGIS) are same.
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/conversion-from-one-format-to-another-is-very-slow-tp5073787p5074562.html
Sent from the GDAL - De
mail2vajram wrote:
I t will take nearly 25 minutes to convert 250 mb of tiff image to ASCII
Thank u.
Compared to how much in ArcGIS with the same computer? And what are the
results if you do first ArcGIS and then GDAL? The order may be
important. Are all programs and files local?
Ar
I t will take nearly 25 minutes to convert 250 mb of tiff image to ASCII
Thank u.
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/conversion-from-one-format-to-another-is-very-slow-tp5073787p5074491.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
