Le lundi 22 juin 2015 08:29:18, Pablo d'Angelo a écrit :
> Hi Even,
>
> Am 19.06.2015 um 23:53 schrieb Even Rouault:
> > Actually keeping the RPC metadata as it is found in the sources (with the
> > exception of Pleiades and their weird center of pixel (1,1) convention
> > perhaps, as proposed in
Hi Even,
Am 19.06.2015 um 23:53 schrieb Even Rouault:
Actually keeping the RPC metadata as it is found in the sources (with the
exception of Pleiades and their weird center of pixel (1,1) convention
perhaps, as proposed in
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/attachment/ticket/5993/fix_PleiadesRPC.patch
Le vendredi 19 juin 2015 23:00:18, Frank Warmerdam a écrit :
> Even,
>
> I feel that the RPC coefficients have well establish meanings from the
> NITF spec, and file formats like _rpc.txt. I assume they are
> center-of-pixel oriented.
I couldn't find anything explicit about that when skimming t
Even,
I feel that the RPC coefficients have well establish meanings from the
NITF spec, and file formats like _rpc.txt. I assume they are
center-of-pixel oriented. I would *not* want the RPC metadata we keep
(ie https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc22_rpc) to have a different
meaning for the pixe
Hi,
I think the vendor specific shifts should be accepted to RPC while
reading via mdreader or something same. So the fix_PleiadesRPC.patch
looks good.
Also about changing alg/gdal_rpc.cpp: мaybe the addition config key,
i.e. RPC_SHIFT which will be 0.5 as default value?
Best regards,
Dmi
Le vendredi 19 juin 2015 15:47:54, Pablo d'Angelo a écrit :
> Dear GDAL Developers,
>
> i have recently compared the results of our internal RPC based
> orthorectification software and have found several difference, which I
> think are due to various "corner" vs "center" of pixel issues in the RPC
Dear GDAL Developers,
i have recently compared the results of our internal RPC based
orthorectification software and have found several difference, which I
think are due to various "corner" vs "center" of pixel issues in the RPC
transform code. This lead to significant shifts when using lower
