Le mardi 19 mai 2015 16:31:52, Jukka Rahkonen a écrit :
> Even Rouault spatialys.com> writes:
> > I'm wondering if it might not make more sense to modify the input
>
> driver(s) to
>
> > not report out-of-range nodata values ? I fail to see a reason to report
> > an out-of-range nodata value.
>
Even Rouault spatialys.com> writes:
>
> I'm wondering if it might not make more sense to modify the input
driver(s) to
> not report out-of-range nodata values ? I fail to see a reason to report an
> out-of-range nodata value.
I wonder what happens for the nodata value if we convert images wi
Le mardi 19 mai 2015 16:16:05, Ivan Lucena a écrit :
> > From: even.roua...@spatialys.com
> > To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> > Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 58: Removing Dataset Nodata Value
> > Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:38 +0200
> > CC: lucena
> From: even.roua...@spatialys.com
> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 58: Removing Dataset Nodata Value
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 16:10:38 +0200
> CC: lucena_i...@hotmail.com; jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi
>
> Le mardi 19 mai 2015 16:06:59
nodata value.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> > From: jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi
> > Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:43:38 +
> > Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 58: Removing Dataset Nodata Value
> >
> > Ivan Lucena hotmail.com>
for example) and miss the good ones.
Thanks.
> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> From: jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi
> Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 13:43:38 +0000
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 58: Removing Dataset Nodata Value
>
> Ivan Lucena hotmail.com> writes:
>
Ivan Lucena hotmail.com> writes:
> Would that be feasible to accept the option "-a_nodata NO" on GDAL command
lines, to indicate that NoData should not pass from the input to the output
dataset?
Would it be something different than "-a_nodata none"?
-a_nodata value:
Assign a specified nodat
Hi Ivan,
>
> Since the SetNoDataValue and GetNodataValue is based on the limitation of
> GeoTiff I would not expect DeleteNoDataValue to be any different. For
> example, there is no way to set/get NoData for individuals bands, there is
> no way to set/get an array of NoData values or NoData value
O" on GDAL command
lines, to indicate that NoData should not pass from the input to the output
dataset?
Best regards,
Ivan
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 08:50:50 +0200
From: sc...@sarvision.nl
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] RFC 58: Removing Dataset Nodata Value
On 05/18/2015 08:37 PM, Sean Gillies wrote:
Hi all,
In consultation with Even Rouault, I've written up RFC 58.
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc58_removing_dataset_nodata_value
The gist of it: allowing deletion of a nodata value defined for a dataset,
thereby rendering all pixels valid wit
Hi all,
In consultation with Even Rouault, I've written up RFC 58.
https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc58_removing_dataset_nodata_value
The gist of it: allowing deletion of a nodata value defined for a dataset,
thereby rendering all pixels valid without copying data to a new file.
I'd love yo
11 matches
Mail list logo
