Tamas,
I agree with Frank's comments. The few remaining traces of subblocking
mechanism should be removed : the bSubBlockingActive, nSubBlocksPerRow,
nSubBlocksPerColumn members of GDALRasterBand and all associated code.
I've an few additional comments on the patch :
* The CACHE_SIZE_MAX =
Tamas Szekeres wrote:
I'm about to handle issue #1 by introducing RFC26 which would establish
a hastable based caching solution in parallel to the current array based
block cache implementation.
As this change would affect the gdal core it seems reasonable to come up
with a new RFC here and ope
Devs,
I'm quite involved in fixing the problems have already been raised in
http://n2.nabble.com/Problems-with-large-raster-sizes-WMS-TMS-td3996139.html
Those issues are mostly related to the following issues:
1. The current GDAL block cache implementation may result in out of memory
errors with
