On 28 April 2012 23:38, Even Rouault wrote:
>>
>> Long story short, for printf:
>> %f -> double
>> %Lf -> for long double.
>>
>> for scanf::
>> %f -> float
>> %lf -> double
>> %Lf -> for long double.
>>
>> Or, I'm misunderstanding the C99 document.
>> If I'm correct, then all C99 compilers should
>
> Long story short, for printf:
> %f -> double
> %Lf -> for long double.
>
> for scanf::
> %f -> float
> %lf -> double
> %Lf -> for long double.
>
> Or, I'm misunderstanding the C99 document.
> If I'm correct, then all C99 compilers should printf using %Lf
> but not %lf, thus json-c is incorre
On 28 April 2012 14:07, Even Rouault wrote:
> Le samedi 28 avril 2012 14:09:35, Mateusz Loskot a écrit :
>> I do not use MinGW, but could you or anyone who is concerned about MinGW
>> support try the following test and report any errors occurred?
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/2518402
>
> I've trie
Le samedi 28 avril 2012 14:09:35, Mateusz Loskot a écrit :
> Even, Folks,
>
> I noticed your commit r18545 in json-c version maintained in GDAL tree [1].
>
> It says: "bug fix submitted to jsonc maintener now"
> I don't know the details who, how and where this was submitted to the
> upstream,
We
Even, Folks,
I noticed your commit r18545 in json-c version maintained in GDAL tree [1].
It says: "bug fix submitted to jsonc maintener now"
I don't know the details who, how and where this was submitted to the
upstream, but
quick investigation [2] I've made suggests this change hasn't made it
to
