wrote:
> Ok why does this not happen with multi band jpgs?
>
>
>
> From: Even Rouault [mailto:even.roua...@mines-paris.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:13 PM
> To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
> Cc: Ethan Alpert
> Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Problem with garbage bytes of data a
Ok why does this not happen with multi band jpgs?
From: Even Rouault [mailto:even.roua...@mines-paris.org]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:13 PM
To: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
Cc: Ethan Alpert
Subject: Re: [gdal-dev] Problem with garbage bytes of data after EOI marker in
single band JPEG
Le
Le vendredi 13 avril 2012 19:53:41, Ethan Alpert a écrit :
>
> This has been running for years. Recently a customer who receives these
> started scanning the JPG's for security threats. Turns out that the
> JPG's I've been writing have garbage data after the JPEG EOI marker.
>
This is not garbage
I have a very old GDAL based tool I wrote that creates JPEG thumbnails
for GeoTiff's. Since the GeoTiff's can be any size and I used a perl
script to compute the aspect ratio so I can center a reduced size image
in a square thumbnail.
I'm looking for any suggestions as to how I can look into th