Re: [gdal-dev] Precission problem with atof

2009-07-24 Thread Jorge Arévalo
2009/7/23 Mateusz Loskot : > Jorge ArÊvalo wrote: >> 2009/7/23 Mateusz Loskot : >>> Jorge Ar�Švalo wrote:: Hello, Context: GDAL WKT Raster Driver While creating the Dataset, I execute this query: SELECT srid, ST_AsText(extent), pixelsize_x, pixelsize_y, blocksi

Re: [gdal-dev] Precission problem with atof

2009-07-22 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Jorge ArÊvalo wrote: > 2009/7/23 Mateusz Loskot : >> Jorge Ar�Švalo wrote:: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Context: GDAL WKT Raster Driver >>> >>> While creating the Dataset, I execute this query: >>> >>> SELECT srid, ST_AsText(extent), pixelsize_x, pixelsize_y, blocksize_x, >>> blocksize_y FROM raster_colu

Re: [gdal-dev] Precission problem with atof

2009-07-22 Thread Jorge Arévalo
Hello Mateusz, 2009/7/23 Mateusz Loskot : > Jorge ArĂŠvalo wrote:: >> Hello, >> >> Context: GDAL WKT Raster Driver >> >> While creating the Dataset, I execute this query: >> >> SELECT srid, ST_AsText(extent), pixelsize_x, pixelsize_y, blocksize_x, >> blocksize_y FROM raster_columns WHERE r_table_n

Re: [gdal-dev] Precission problem with atof

2009-07-22 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Jorge ArĂŠvalo wrote:: > Hello, > > Context: GDAL WKT Raster Driver > > While creating the Dataset, I execute this query: > > SELECT srid, ST_AsText(extent), pixelsize_x, pixelsize_y, blocksize_x, > blocksize_y FROM raster_columns WHERE r_table_name = 'table' AND > r_column = 'rast' > > I have load

Re: [gdal-dev] Precission problem with atof

2009-07-22 Thread Jorge Arévalo
Hello, 2009/7/23 Adam Nowacki : > Jorge Arévalo wrote: >> >>  fPixelSizeX = atof(PQgetvalue(hPGresult, 0, 2)); >> >> I get 0.89976158142 instead of 0.9. > > 0.89976158142... is the value closest to 0.9 that a single precision > float variable can store. > Using 'double' should give 0.9

Re: [gdal-dev] Precission problem with atof

2009-07-22 Thread Adam Nowacki
Jorge Arévalo wrote: fPixelSizeX = atof(PQgetvalue(hPGresult, 0, 2)); I get 0.89976158142 instead of 0.9. 0.89976158142... is the value closest to 0.9 that a single precision float variable can store. Using 'double' should give 0.90002220...

[gdal-dev] Precission problem with atof

2009-07-22 Thread Jorge Arévalo
Hello, Context: GDAL WKT Raster Driver While creating the Dataset, I execute this query: SELECT srid, ST_AsText(extent), pixelsize_x, pixelsize_y, blocksize_x, blocksize_y FROM raster_columns WHERE r_table_name = 'table' AND r_column = 'rast' I have loaded a 3-band tiff file with gdal2tiles. It